UNITED STATES
               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                            FORM 10-K
(Mark One)

 /X/      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)

          For the fiscal year ended:  December 31, 1999

                               or

 / /      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
          THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)

          For the transition period from __________ to __________

                 Commission File Number:  1-7677

                        LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
     (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

        Delaware                                 73-1015226
 (State of Incorporation)                      (I.R.S. Employer
                                              Identification No.)
    16 South Pennsylvania Avenue
       Oklahoma City, Oklahoma                           73107
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)              (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:

                         (405) 235-4546

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                                           Name of Each Exchange
       Title of Each Class                  On Which Registered
Common Stock, Par Value $.10              Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board*
$3.25 Convertible Exchangeable
  Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2       Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board*
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Preferred Share Purchase Rights*

*  Delisted from the New York Stock Exchange on July 6, 1999.

                    (Facing Sheet Continued)




      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all  reports  required by Section 13 or 15(d) of  the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or  for  the
shorter  period that the Registrant has had to file the reports),
and  (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past
90 days.  YES   X    NO _____.

      Indicate  by check mark if disclosure of delinquent  filers
pursuant  to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained  herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge,
in  definitive  proxy or information statements  incorporated  by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to  this
Form 10-K. __________.

      As  of  April  7, 2000, the aggregate market value  of  the
7,656,337  shares  of  voting stock of  the  Registrant  held  by
non-affiliates  of  the Company equaled approximately  $5,497,250
based  on the closing sales price for the Company's common  stock
as reported for that date on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.
That   amount  does  not  include  the  1,462  shares  of  voting
Convertible  Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock (the  "Non-Cumulative
Preferred  Stock")  held by non-affiliates of  the  Company.   An
active  trading  market does not exist for  the  shares  of  Non-
Cumulative Preferred Stock.

     As of April 7, 2000, the Registrant had 11,877,411 shares of
common  stock outstanding (excluding 3,285,957 shares  of  common
stock held as treasury stock).

                FORM 10-K OF LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.

                        TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                        Page
                             PART I

Item  1.  Business

               General                                      1
               Segment Information and Foreign
                 and Domestic Operations and Export Sales   2
               Chemical Business                            3
               Climate Control Business                     8
Industrial Products Business                                11
               Employees                                    12
               Research and Development                     12
Environmental Matters                                       13


Item 2.   Properties

               Chemical Business                            15
               Climate Control Business                     16
               Industrial Products Business                 17

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings                                 17

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of
            Security Holders                                18

Item 4A.  Executive Officers of the Company                 19

                             PART II

Item 5.   Market for Company's Common Equity
              and Related Stockholder Matters
               Market Information                           20
               Stockholders                                 20
               Other Information                            20
               Dividends                                    20

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data                           24

Item 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis
            of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
               Overview                                     26
               Results of Operations                        34
               Liquidity and Capital Resources              38
               Impact of Year 2000                          48



                                                            Page

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
            Risk
               General                                      49
               Interest Rate Risk                           49
               Raw Material Price Risk                      51
               Foreign Currency Risk                        51

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data       51

Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants
            on Accounting and Financial Disclosure          52


Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements           53

                                   PART III                 55


                                   PART IV

Item 14.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and
            Reports on Form 8-K                             56

                             PART I
Item 1.   BUSINESS

General

      LSB Industries, Inc. (the "Company") was formed in 1968  as
an   Oklahoma  corporation,  and  in  1977  became   a   Delaware
corporation.  The Company is a diversified holding company  which
is  engaged, through its subsidiaries, in (i) the manufacture and
sale  of  chemical products for the explosives, agricultural  and
industrial  acids  markets (the "Chemical  Business"),  (ii)  the
manufacture and sale of a broad range of hydronic fan  coils  and
water  source  heat  pumps  as well as  other  products  used  in
commercial and residential air conditioning systems (the "Climate
Control  Business"), and (iii) the purchase and sale  of  machine
tools (the "Industrial Products Business").

      The  Company is pursuing a strategy of focusing on its core
businesses  and concentrating on product lines in  niche  markets
where the Company has established or believes it can establish  a
position as a market leader.  In addition, the Company is seeking
to  improve  its  liquidity and profits  through  liquidation  of
selected assets that are on its balance sheet and on which it  is
not realizing an acceptable return and does not reasonably expect
to  do so. In this regard, the Company has come to the conclusion
that  its Industrial and Automotive Products Businesses are  non-
core  to  the  Company.   As discussed in Item  7,  "Management's
Discussion  and  Analysis of Financial Condition and  Results  of
Operations-Industrial   Products  Business",   the   Company   is
currently  evaluating opportunities to sell or  realize  its  net
investment in the Business. On April 5, 2000, the Company's Board
of  Directors  approved  a definitive  plan  to  dispose  of  the
Automotive  Products Business.  This plan will allow the  Company
to  focus  its  efforts  and  financial  resources  on  its  core
businesses.   In  an  effort  to  make  the  Automotive  Products
Business  viable so that it can be sold, on March  9,  2000,  the
Automotive  Products  Business acquired  certain  assets  of  the
Zeller  Corporation  ("Zeller") representing  Zeller's  universal
joint  business.   In  connection with the acquisition  of  these
assets, the Automotive Products Business assumed an aggregate  of
approximately  $7.5 million (unaudited) in Zeller's  liabilities,
$4.7  million  of  which  was funded by the  Automotive  Products
Business primary lender.  (The balance of the assumed liabilities
is expected to be funded out of working capital of the Automotive
Products  Business).  For the year ended December 31,  1999,  the
universal  joint  business  of  Zeller  had  unaudited  sales  of
approximately $11.7 and a net loss of $1.5 million.

      In connection with the Automotive Products Business plan of
disposal, the Company's Board of Directors approved a sale of the
Business  to an identified third party, subject to completion  of
certain   conditions  (including  approval  from  the  Automotive
Products Business' primary lender).  It is anticipated that  this
sale will be completed by June 30, 2000.  Upon completion of  the
sale of the Automotive Products Business, the Company  expects to
receive  notes  receivable  in the  approximate  amount  of  $8.0
million, such notes being secured by a second lien on the  assets
of  the  Automotive  Products  Business.  These  notes,  and  any
payments of principal and interest, thereon, will be subordinated
to  the buyer's primary lender (which is the same lender that  is
the  current primary lender to the Automotive Products Business).
LSB  will receive no principal payments under the notes  for  the
first  two  years  following the sale of the Automotive  Products
Business.   In addition, the buyer will assume substantially  all
of the Automotive Products Business' debts and obligations, which
at  December  31, 1999, prior to the Zeller acquisition,  totaled
$22.2 million.

     The notes to be received by the Company will be secured by a
lien on all of the assets of the buyer and its subsidiaries, with
the  notes  to  be  received by the Company  and  liens  securing
payment  of all of the notes subordinated to the buyer's  primary
lender  and  will  be  subject to any liens  outstanding  on  the
assets.   As of March 31, 2000, the Automotive Products  Business
owes  its primary lender approximately $14.0 million.  After  the
sale,  the  Company  will  also remain  a  guarantor  on  certain
equipment  notes  of  the  Automotive  Products  Business  (which
equipment  notes  have an outstanding principal balance  of  $4.5
million as of March 31, 2000) and will continue to guaranty up to
$1  million of the revolving credit facility of the buyer, as  it
did  for  its Automotive Products Business.  If the sale  of  the
Automotive   Products  Business  is  completed,  there   are   no
assurances that the Company will be able to collect on the  notes
issued  to the Company as consideration for the purchase or  that
the  debts  and  obligations of the Automotive Products  Business
assumed by the buyer will be paid.

      The Company has classified its investment in the Automotive
Products Business as a discontinued operation,  reserving its net
investment  of approximately $7.9 million in 1999.  This  reserve
does  not  include  the loss, if any, which  may  result  if  the
Company is required to perform on its guaranties described above.

      For  the twelve month period ended December 31, 1999,  1998
and 1997, the Automotive Products Business had revenues of $33.4,
$40.0  and  $35.5 million, respectively and a net loss of  $18.1,
$4.4  and  $9.7  million respectively.  See Note 4  of  Notes  to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Segment  Information  and  Foreign and  Domestic  Operations  and
Export Sales

      Schedules  of  the amounts of sales, operating  profit  and
loss,  and  identifiable  assets  attributable  to  each  of  the
Company's lines of business and of the amount of export sales  of
the  Company  in the aggregate and by major geographic  area  for
each  of the Company's last three fiscal years appear in Note  17
of  the  Notes  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  included
elsewhere in this report.

     A discussion of any risks attendant as a result of a foreign
operation  or  the  importing of products from foreign  countries
appears below in the discussion of each of the Company's business
segments.

      All discussions below are that of the Businesses continuing
and  accordingly  exclude  the  Discontinued  operations  of  the
Automotive  Products  Business and  the  Australian  subsidiary's
operations sold in 1999.  See discussion above and Notes 4 and  5
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Chemical Business

     General

     The Company's Chemical Business manufactures three principal
product  lines  that  are  derived from  anhydrous  ammonia:  (1)
fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate for the agricultural  industry,
(2)  explosive grade ammonium nitrate for the mining industry and
(3)  concentrated, blended and mixed nitric acid  for  industrial
applications.   In  addition, the Company also produces  sulfuric
acid for commercial applications primarily in the paper industry.
The  Chemical  Business products are sold in niche markets  where
the  Company  believes it can establish a position  as  a  market
leader.  See "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".
The  Chemical  Business'  principal  manufacturing  facility   is
located  in El Dorado, Arkansas ("El Dorado Facility"),  and  its
other  manufacturing facilities are located in Hallowell, Kansas,
Wilmington, North Carolina, and Baytown, Texas.

      For  each  of  the years 1999, 1998 and 1997, approximately
26%, 29% and 31% of the respective sales of the Chemical Business
consisted  of  sales of fertilizer and related chemical  products
for  agricultural purposes, which represented approximately  13%,
14%  and  16%  of  the  Company's  consolidated  sales  for  each
respective  year.   For each of the years 1999,  1998  and  1997,
approximately  34%, 47% and 53% of the respective  sales  of  the
Chemical  Business  consisted of sales of  ammonium  nitrate  and
other  chemical-based blasting products for the mining  industry,
which represented approximately 17%, 23% and 27% of the Company's
1999,  1998 and 1997 consolidated sales, respectively.  For  each
of  the years 1999, 1998 and 1997, approximately 40%, 24% and 16%
of the respective sales of the Chemical Business consisted of the
Industrial  Acids  for  sale  in the food,  paper,  chemical  and
electronics industries, which represented approximately 20%,  12%
and  9%  of the Company's 1999, 1998 and 1997 consolidated sales,
respectively.   Sales  of  the Chemical  Business  accounted  for
approximately  50%, 49% and 52% of the Company's 1999,  1998  and
1997 consolidated sales, respectively.

     Agricultural Products

     The Chemical Business produces ammonium nitrate, a nitrogen-
based  fertilizer,  at  the El Dorado  Facility.   In  1999,  the
Company  sold  approximately 135,000  tons  of  ammonium  nitrate
fertilizer   to  farmers,  fertilizer  dealers  and  distributors
located primarily in the south central United States (143,000 and
184,000 tons in 1998 and 1997, respectively).

      Ammonium  nitrate is one of several forms of nitrogen-based
fertilizers which includes anhydrous ammonia.  Although, to  some
extent,  the  various  forms  of nitrogen-based  fertilizers  are
interchangeable, each has its own characteristics  which  produce
agronomic preferences among end users.  Farmers decide which type
of  nitrogen-based fertilizer to apply based on the crop planted,
soil  and  weather  conditions, regional  farming  practices  and
relative nitrogen fertilizer prices.

     The Chemical Business markets its ammonium nitrate primarily
in  Texas,  Arkansas and the surrounding regions.   This  market,
which is in close proximity to its El Dorado Facility, includes a
high  concentration  of pasture land and row  crops  which  favor
ammonium  nitrate  over  other nitrogen-based  fertilizers.   The
Company   has  developed  their  market  position  in  Texas   by
emphasizing high quality products, customer service and technical
advice.   Using  a  proprietary  prilling  process,  the  Company
produces  a  high  performance ammonium nitrate fertilizer  that,
because  of  its  uniform  size, is easier  to  apply  than  many
competing   nitrogen-based  fertilizer  products.   The   Company
believes  that  its  "E-2" brand ammonium nitrate  fertilizer  is
recognized  as a premium product within its primary  market.   In
addition, the Company has developed long term relationships  with
end  users  through  its  network  of  20  wholesale  and  retail
distribution centers.

      In  1998 and 1999, the Chemical Business has been adversely
affected by the drought conditions in the mid-south market during
the  primary fertilizer season, along with the importation of low
priced  Russian ammonium nitrate, resulting in lower sales volume
and  lower  sales price for certain of its products sold  in  its
agricultural  markets. The Chemical Business is a  member  of  an
organization  of  domestic  fertilizer  grade  ammonium   nitrate
producers  which  is  seeking relief  from  unfairly  low  priced
Russian  ammonium nitrate.  This industry group filed a  petition
in July 1999 with the U.S. International Trade Commission and the
U.S.  Department of Commerce seeking an antidumping investigation
and,   if   warranted,   relief  from   Russian   dumping.    The
International   Trade   Commission  has  rendered   a   favorable
preliminary determination that U.S. producers of ammonium nitrate
have  been  injured  as  a  result of  Russian  ammonium  nitrate
imports.  In addition, the U.S. Department of Commerce has issued
a  preliminary affirmative determination that the Russian imports
were  sold  at  prices that are 264.59% below their  fair  market
value.   As  a  result  of the Commerce Department's  preliminary
ruling,  all  imports of Russian ammonium nitrate  are  currently
subject  to potential antidumping duty liability.  The Department
of Commerce is due to issue a final determination by May 22, 2000
and  the  International Trade Commission by July  5,  2000.   The
relief currently in place will remain only if both agencies  make
final  affirmative  determinations.  It is not known,  therefore,
whether the antidumping action will be successful upon conclusion
of   the  U.S.  Government's  investigation.   See  "Management's
Discussion  and  Analysis of Financial Condition and  Results  of
Operations"   and   "Special   Note   Regarding   Forward-Looking
Statements".

     Explosives

      The  Chemical  Business manufactures low  density  ammonium
nitrate-based  explosives  including  bulk  explosives  used   in
surface mining.  In addition, the Company manufactures and  sells
a  branded  line  of  packaged explosives used  in  construction,
quarrying  and other applications, particularly where  controlled
explosive  charges are required.  The Company's  bulk  explosives
are  marketed primarily through eight distribution centers,  five
of which are located in close proximity to the customers' surface
mines  in  the  coal  producing  states  of  Kentucky,  Missouri,
Tennessee  and West Virginia.  The Company emphasizes value-added
customer  services and specialized product applications  for  its
bulk  explosives.   Most of the sales of bulk explosives  are  to
customers   who   work  closely  with  the  Company's   technical
representatives  in  meeting their specific  product  needs.   In
addition,  the  Company  sells  bulk  explosives  to  independent
wholesalers   and   to  other  explosives  companies.    Packaged
explosives   are  used  for  applications  requiring   controlled
explosive  charges  and typically command  a  premium  price  and
produce  higher margins. The Company's Slurry packaged  explosive
products  are  sold  nationally  and  internationally  to   other
explosive companies and end-users.

      In  August,  1999, the Company sold substantially  all  the
assets  of  its wholly owned Australian subsidiary, Total  Energy
Systems  Limited and its subsidiaries.  See "Note 5 to  Notes  to
Consolidated Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".




     Industrial Acids

      The  Chemical  Business manufactures and  sells  industrial
acids,  primarily  to the food, paper, chemical  and  electronics
industries.   The Company is a leading supplier to third  parties
of  concentrated nitric acid, which is a special grade of  nitric
acid  used  in  the  manufacture  of  plastics,  pharmaceuticals,
herbicides,   explosives,  and  other  chemical   products.    In
addition,  the  Company produces and sells regular,  blended  and
mixed nitric acid and a variety of grades of sulfuric acid.   The
Company competes on the basis of price and service, including on-
time  reliability  and  distribution  capabilities.  The  Company
provides inventory management as part of the value-added services
it offers to its customers.

     EDNC Baytown Plant

      Subsidiaries within the Company's Chemical Business entered
into    a   series   of   agreements   with   Bayer   Corporation
("Bayer")(collectively, the "Bayer Agreement").  Under the  Bayer
Agreement, El Dorado Nitrogen Company ("EDNC") acted as an  agent
to construct and, upon completion of construction, is operating a
nitric  acid plant (the "EDNC Baytown Plant") at Bayer's Baytown,
Texas chemical facility.

     Under the terms of the Bayer Agreement, EDNC leases the EDNC
Baytown  Plant  pursuant to a leveraged lease from  an  unrelated
third party with an initial lease term of ten years from the date
on  which the EDNC Baytown Plant became fully operational (in May
1999).  Bayer will purchase from EDNC all of its requirements for
nitric  acid  to be used by Bayer at its Baytown, Texas  facility
for  ten years following May 1999.  EDNC will purchase from Bayer
its  requirements  for anhydrous ammonia for the  manufacture  of
nitric acid as well as utilities and other services.  Subject  to
certain conditions, EDNC is entitled to sell to third parties the
amount  of  nitric  acid manufactured at the EDNC  Baytown  Plant
which  is  in excess of Bayer's requirements. The Bayer Agreement
provides  that  Bayer will make certain net monthly  payments  to
EDNC  which  will be sufficient for EDNC to recover  all  of  its
costs, as defined, plus a profit.  The Company estimates that  at
full  production  capacity based on terms of the Bayer  Agreement
and  subject to the price of anhydrous ammonia, the EDNC  Baytown
Plant  is  anticipated to generate approximately $35  million  in
annual  gross  revenues.   See "Special Note  Regarding  Forward-
Looking  Statements".   Upon expiration of the  initial  ten-year
term from the date the EDNC Baytown Plant became operational, the
Bayer  Agreement  may be renewed for up to six renewal  terms  of
five  years  each; however, prior to each renewal period,  either
party to the Bayer Agreement may opt against renewal.

      EDNC  and  Bayer  have  an option to  terminate  the  Bayer
Agreement upon the occurrence of certain events of default if not
cured.  Bayer retains the right of first refusal with respect  to
any  bona fide third-party offer to purchase any voting stock  of
EDNC or any portion of the EDNC Baytown Plant.

      In  January,  1999,  the contractor constructing  the  EDNC
Baytown  Plant  informed the Company that it could  not  complete
construction alleging a lack of financial resources.  The Company
and  certain other parties involved in this project demanded  the
contractors  bonding  company  to  provide  funds  necessary  for
subcontractors  to  complete  construction.   The  Company,   the
contractor,  the  bonding  company  and  Bayer  entered  into  an
agreement  which  provided  that the bonding  company  pay  $12.9
million  for payments to subcontractors for work performed  prior
to  February  1,  1999.   In addition, the contractor  agreed  to
provide,  on  a no cost basis, project management  and  to  incur
certain  other  additional costs through the  completion  of  the
contract.   Because of this delay, an amendment was entered  into
in  connection with the Bayer Agreement.  The amendment  extended
the  requirement date that the plant be in production to May  31,
1999,  and  fully operational by June 30, 1999.  The construction
of  the  EDNC Baytown Plant was completed in May 1999,  and  EDNC
began producing and delivering nitric acid to Bayer at that time.
Sales  by  EDNC to Bayer out of the EDNC Baytown Plant production
during  1999, were approximately $17.2 million. Financing of  the
EDNC  Baytown  Plant  was  provided by  an  unaffiliated  lender.
Neither  the Company nor EDC has guaranteed any of the  repayment
obligations for the EDNC Baytown Plant.  In connection  with  the
leveraged  lease,  the  Company entered  into  an  interest  rate
forward  agreement to fix the effective rate of interest implicit
in  such  lease.   See  "Special Note  Regarding  Forward-Looking
Statements"  and  Note  2  of  Notes  to  Consolidated  Financial
Statements.

     Raw Materials

      Anhydrous ammonia represents the primary component  in  the
production of most of the products of the Chemical Business.  See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  and
Results of Operations."  The Chemical Business normally purchases
approximately 200,000 tons of anhydrous ammonia per year for  use
in  its manufacture of its products.  Due to lower sales in 1999,
the  Company  purchases of anhydrous ammonia  were  approximately
151,000 tons.

      During  1999,  the  Chemical  Business  purchased  its  raw
material  requirements of anhydrous ammonia from three  suppliers
at  an  average  cost per ton of approximately $145  compared  to
approximately $154 per ton in 1998 and approximately $184 per ton
in  1997.   During the second half of 1999, the majority  of  the
Chemical  Business' raw material purchases were  made  under  one
contract  as  supply contracts with the other two suppliers  were
terminated.  In October, 1999, the Chemical Business renegotiated
its remaining contract, which provides the Chemical Business with
an  extended  term  to  purchase the  anhydrous  ammonia  it  was
required  to  purchase  as of December 31,  1999  (96,000  tons).
Under  the  renegotiated contract, the Chemical  Business  is  to
purchase  the 96,000 tons at a minimum of 2,000 tons of anhydrous
ammonia  per month during 2000 and 3,000 tons per month  in  2001
and  2002, at prices which could exceed or be less than the  then
current  spot  market price for anhydrous ammonia.  In  addition,
under  the  renegotiated  requirements contract  the  Company  is
committed  to  purchase  50%  of its  remaining  requirements  of
anhydrous  ammonia through 2002 from this third party  at  prices
which  will approximate the then current spot market  price.   In
January,  2000,  the  supplier under  this  requirement  contract
agreed  to  supply  the Chemical Business other requirements  for
anhydrous  ammonia  for a one (1) year term at approximately  the
then  current spot market price, which one (1) year agreement  is
terminable on 120 days notice.

      During  the second half of 1998 and during 1999, an  excess
supply  of nitrate based products, caused, in part, by the import
of Russian nitrate, has caused a significant decline in the sales
prices.  This decline in sales price has resulted in the cost  of
anhydrous  ammonia  purchased  under  the  above  contract   when
combined  with  manufacturing and distribution costs,  to  exceed
anticipated  future  sales prices.  See "Special  Note  Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements," and Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.

      The Company believes that it could obtain anhydrous ammonia
from  other  sources in the event of a termination of the  above-
referenced contract.
     Seasonality

      The Company believes that the only seasonal products of the
Chemical  Business  are fertilizer and related chemical  products
sold to the agricultural industry.  The selling seasons for those
products  are  primarily  during the  spring  and  fall  planting
seasons,  which  typically extend from February through  May  and
from  September through November in the geographical  markets  in
which  the  majority of the Company's agricultural  products  are
distributed.   As a result, the Chemical Business  increases  its
inventory  of  ammonium nitrate prior to the  beginning  of  each
planting  season.  Sales to the agricultural markets depend  upon
weather conditions and other circumstances beyond the control  of
the  Company.  The agricultural markets serviced by the  Chemical
Business  have sustained a drought resulting in a lack of  demand
for  the  Chemical Business' fertilizer products during the  1998
and 1999 fall and spring planting seasons and have had a material
adverse effect of the Company.

     Regulatory Matters

      Each  of  the Chemical Business' domestic blasting  product
distribution  centers  are licensed by  the  Bureau  of  Alcohol,
Tobacco  and  Firearms  in  order to manufacture  and  distribute
blasting  products.   The Chemical Business is  also  subject  to
extensive federal, state and local environmental laws, rules  and
regulations.     See   "Environmental   Matters"    and    "Legal
Proceedings".

     Competition

     The Chemical Business competes with other chemical companies
in  its  markets, many of whom have greater financial  and  other
resources   than   the  Company.   The  Company   believes   that
competition within the markets served by the Chemical Business is
primarily  based  upon  price,  service,  warranty  and   product
performance.

     Developments in Asia

     During 1999, the Chemical Business sold substantially all of
the  assets  of  its  Australian subsidiary.   See  "Management's
Discussion  and  Analysis of Financial Condition and  Results  of
Operations" and Note 5 to Consolidated Financial Statements for a
discussion of the terms of the sale and the loss sustained by the
Company  as a result of the disposition of the Chemical Business'
Australian subsidiary.

Climate Control Business

     General

      The  Company's  Climate Control Business  manufactures  and
sells a broad range of standard and custom designed hydronic  fan
coils  and water source heat pumps as well as other products  for
use  in  commercial and residential heating ventilation  and  air
conditioning  ("HVAC") systems.  Demand for the  Climate  Control
Business'  products is driven by the construction of  commercial,
institutional  and  residential  buildings,  the  renovation   of
existing buildings and the replacement of existing systems.   The
Climate Control Business' commercial products are used in a  wide
variety of buildings, such as:  hotels, motels, office buildings,
schools,   universities,  apartments,  condominiums,   hospitals,
nursing   homes,  extended  care  facilities,  supermarkets   and
superstores.  Many of the Company's products are targeted to meet
increasingly  stringent indoor air quality and energy  efficiency
standards.    The   Climate   Control  Business   accounted   for
approximately  46%, 45% and 42% of the Company's 1999,  1998  and
1997 consolidated sales, respectively.

     Hydronic Fan Coils

      The  Climate  Control  Business is a  leading  provider  of
hydronic  fan  coils targeted to the commercial and institutional
markets  in  the  U.S. Hydronic fan coils use heated  or  chilled
water,  provided  by a centralized chiller or  boiler  through  a
water pipe system, to condition the air and allow individual room
control.   Hydronic fan coil systems are quieter and have  longer
lives  and  lower maintenance costs than comparable systems  used
where  individual room control is required. The  breadth  of  the
product line coupled with customization capability provided by  a
flexible  manufacturing process are important components  of  the
Company's   strategy   for  competing  in  the   commercial   and
institutional renovation and replacement markets.   See  "Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".

     Water Source Heat Pumps

      The Company is a leading U.S. provider of water source heat
pumps  to  the  commercial construction and  renovation  markets.
These are highly efficient heating and cooling units which enable
individual  room  climate control through the  transfer  of  heat
through  a  water pipe system which is connected to a centralized
cooling tower or heat injector.  Water source heat pumps enjoy  a
broad range of commercial applications, particularly in medium to
large  sized  buildings with many small, individually  controlled
spaces.   The  Company believes the market for  commercial  water
source  heat  pumps  will continue to grow due  to  the  relative
efficiency and long life of such systems as compared to other air
conditioning and heating systems, as well as to the emergence  of
the  replacement  market for those systems.   See  "Special  Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".

     Geothermal Products

      The  Climate Control Business is a pioneer in  the  use  of
geothermal  water source heat pumps in residential and commercial
applications.   Geothermal  systems,  which  circulate  water  or
antifreeze through an underground heat exchanger, are  among  the
most  energy  efficient systems available.  The Company  believes
the  longer  life,  lower cost to operate, and  relatively  short
payback  periods of geothermal systems, as compared with  air-to-
air  systems, will continue to increase demand for its geothermal
products.  The Company is specifically targeting new  residential
construction of homes exceeding $200,000 in value.  See  "Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".

     Hydronic Fan Coil and Water Source Heat Pump Market

      The  Company  has  pursued a strategy  of  specializing  in
hydronic  fan  coils  and water source heat pump  products.   The
annual  U.S. market for hydronic fan coils and water source  heat
pumps is approximately $325 million.  Demand in these markets  is
generally  driven  by  levels  of repair,  replacement,  and  new
construction activity.  The U.S. market for fan coils  and  water
source heat pump products has grown on average 14% per year  over
the  last  4  years.  This growth is primarily a  result  of  new
construction,  the  aging of the installed  base  of  units,  the
introduction of new energy efficient systems, upgrades to central
air   conditioning   and   increased   governmental   regulations
restricting  the  use  of ozone depleting  refrigerants  in  HVAC
systems.

     Production and Backlog

     Most of the Climate Control Business production of the above-
described products occurs on a specific order basis.  The Company
manufactures  the  units  in many sizes  and  configurations,  as
required  by  the  purchaser,  to  fit  the  space  and  capacity
requirements  of  hotels, motels, schools,  hospitals,  apartment
buildings,  office buildings and other commercial or  residential
structures.   As of December 31, 1999, the backlog  of  confirmed
orders  for the Climate Control Business was approximately  $22.1
million  as  compared to approximately $21.1 million at  December
31,  1998.  A customer generally has the right to cancel an order
prior  to the order being released to production. Past experience
indicates that customers generally do not cancel orders after the
Company  receives  them.  As of February 29,  2000,  the  Climate
Control  Business had released substantially all of the  December
31,  1999  backlog to production.  All of the December  31,  1999
backlog  is  expected  to be filled by December  31,  2000.   See
"Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".

     Marketing and Distribution

     Distribution

       The  Climate  Control  Business  sells  its  products   to
mechanical  contractors,  original  equipment  manufacturers  and
distributors.   The  Company's sales  to  mechanical  contractors
primarily     occur     through     independent     manufacturers
representatives, who also represent complementary  product  lines
not    manufactured   by   the   Company.    Original   equipment
manufacturers  generally consist of other  air  conditioning  and
heating equipment manufacturers who resell under their own  brand
name the products purchased from the Climate Control Business  in
competition  with  the  Company.   Sales  to  original  equipment
manufacturers accounted for approximately 27% of the sales of the
Climate  Control Business in 1999 and approximately  12%  of  the
Company's 1999 consolidated sales.

     Market

      The  Climate  Control  Business depends  primarily  on  the
commercial construction industry, including new construction  and
the  remodeling  and  renovation of older buildings.   In  recent
years  this Business has introduced geothermal products  designed
for residential markets for both new and replacement markets.

     Raw Materials

       Numerous  domestic  and  foreign  sources  exist  for  the
materials  used by the Climate Control Business, which  materials
include aluminum, copper, steel, electric motors and compressors.
The Company does not expect to have any difficulties in obtaining
any  necessary  materials for the Climate Control Business.   See
"Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".

     Competition

      The  Climate  Control Business competes with  approximately
eight  companies, some of whom are also customers of the Company.
Some   of  the  competitors  have  greater  financial  and  other
resources  than  the  Company.   The  Climate  Control   Business
manufactures  a  broader line of fan coil and water  source  heat
pump  products than any other manufacturer in the United  States,
and  the  Company believes that it is competitive  as  to  price,
service, warranty and product performance.

     Joint Ventures and Options to Purchase

     The Company has obtained an option (the "Option") to acquire
80%  of  the  issued  and outstanding stock  of  an  Entity  (the
"Optioned  Company")  that  performs  energy  savings  contracts,
primarily  on  US  government facilities.  For  the  Option,  the
Company has paid $1.3 million as of the date of this report.  The
term  of the Option expired May 4, 1999. The Company decided  not
to exercise the Option.  The grantors of the Option are obligated
to  repay  to  the  Company $1.0 million  of  the  Option,  which
obligation  is  secured  by the stock of  the  Entity  and  other
affiliates  of the Optioned Company.  There is no assurance  that
the grantors of the Option will have funds necessary to repay  to
the  Company  the  amount paid for the Option. See  "Management's
Discussion  and  Analysis of Financial Condition and  Results  of
Operations"  for discussion of sale of this investment  in  2000.
Through  the  date of this report, the Company has  advanced  the
Entity  approximately $1.7 million, including  accrued  interest.
The  Company has recorded reserves of approximately $1.5  million
against the loans, accrued interest and option payments.  For its
year  ended  June 30, 1999, the Entity reported  an  audited  net
income of approximately $.4 million.

      During 1994, a subsidiary of the Company obtained an option
to  acquire  all  of  the stock of a French manufacturer  of  air
conditioning and heating equipment.  The Company's subsidiary was
granted the option as a result of the subsidiary loaning  to  the
parent  company  of  the French manufacturer  approximately  $2.1
million.   Subsequent to the loan of $2.1 million, the  Company's
subsidiary has loaned to the parent of the French manufacturer an
additional  $1.6 million.  The amount loaned is  secured  by  the
stock  and  assets  of  the French manufacturer.   The  Company's
subsidiary  may  exercise  its  option  to  acquire  the   French
manufacturer by converting approximately $150,000 of  the  amount
loaned into equity.  The option is currently exercisable and will
expire  June 15, 2005.  As of the date of this report, management
of  the  Company's  subsidiary which holds  the  option  has  not
decided whether it will exercise the option.

      For  1999,  1998  and  1997, the  French  manufacturer  had
revenues  of  $18.9, $17.2 and $14.3 million,  respectively,  and
reported  net  income  of  approximately $600,000,  $100,000  and
$300,000, respectively.  As a result of cumulative losses by  the
French  manufacturer  prior  to  1997,  the  Company  established
reserves against the loans aggregating approximately $1.5 million
through  December  31,  1999.  See "Management's  Discussion  and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".

      In 1995, a subsidiary of the Company invested approximately
$2.8 million to purchase a fifty percent (50%) equity interest in
an  energy  conservation  joint  venture  (the  "Project").   The
Project  had  been  awarded a contract  to  retrofit  residential
housing units at a US Army base, which it completed during  1996.
The  completed  contract was for installation of energy-efficient
equipment  (including  air conditioning  and  heating  equipment)
which would reduce utility consumption.  For the installation and
management, the Project will receive a percent of all energy  and
maintenance  savings during the twenty (20) year  contract  term.
The  Project  spent approximately $17.9 million to  retrofit  the
residential  housing  units at the US  Army  base.   The  project
received  a  loan  from a lender to finance  approximately  $14.0
million  of  the  cost  of  the  Project.   The  Company  is  not
guaranteeing any of the lending obligations of the Project.   The
Company's equity interest in the results of the operations of the
Project  were  not material for the years ended  December,  1999,
1998 and 1997.

Industrial Products Business

     General

      The  Industrial Products Business purchases and  markets  a
proprietary line of machine tools.  The current line  of  machine
tools  distributed  by the Industrial Products Business  includes
milling,  drilling,  turning  and  fabricating   machines.    The
Industrial Products Business purchases most of the machine  tools
from  foreign companies, which manufacture the machine  tools  to
the Company's specifications.  This Business manufactures CNC bed
mills  and  electrical  control panels for  machine  tools.   The
Company  has eliminated in the past, and continues to  eliminate,
certain  categories  of machinery from its product  line  by  not
replacing  them  when  sold.   The Industrial  Products  Business
accounted  for  approximately 4%, 6%  and  6%  of  the  Company's
consolidated  sales   in each of the years 1999,  1998  and  1997
respectively.

     As discussed in "Item 1 - Business General", the Company has
concluded  that its Industrial Products Business is  non-core  to
the Company and is pursuing various alternatives of realizing its
investments in these assets.

     Distribution and Market

      The  Industrial Products Business distributes  its  machine
tools in the United States. The Industrial Products Business also
sells  its machine tools through independent machine tool dealers
throughout the United States, who purchase the machine tools  for
resale  to  end users.  The principal markets for machine  tools,
other  than  machine tool dealers, consist of  manufacturing  and
metal working companies, maintenance facilities, and utilities.

     Foreign Risk

      By  purchasing a majority of the machine tools from foreign
manufacturers, the Industrial Products Business must bear certain
import  duties and international economic risks, such as currency
fluctuations  and  exchange  controls,  and  other   risks   from
political  upheavals  and  changes  in  United  States  or  other
countries' trade policies.  Contracts for the purchase of foreign-
made  machine tools provide for payment in United States dollars.
Circumstances  beyond the control of the Company could  eliminate
or  seriously curtail the supply of machine tools from any one or
all of the foreign countries involved.

     Competition

        The    Industrial   Products   Business   competes   with
manufacturers, importers, and other distributors of machine tools
many  of  whom have greater financial resources than the Company.
The  Company's machine tool business generally is competitive  as
to  price,  warranty  and  service, and  maintains  personnel  to
install and service machine tools.

Employees

     As of December 31, 1999, the Company employed 1,735 persons.
As  of that date, (a) the Chemical Business employed 537 persons,
with  106  represented  by unions under  agreements  expiring  in
August, 2001 and February, 2002, (b) the Climate Control Business
employed  784 persons, none of whom are represented by  a  union,
(c) the Industrial Products Business employed 41 persons, none of
whom  are represented by a union, and (d) the Automotive Products
Business, which the Board of Directors approved a plan to sell or
otherwise  dispose of the operations, employed 311 persons,  with
19  represented  by unions under an agreement expiring  in  July,
2000 .

Research and Development

       The  Company  incurred  approximately  $713,000  in  1999,
$377,000   in  1998,  and  $367,000  in  1997  on  research   and
development  relating to the development of new products  or  the
improvement of existing products.  All expenditures for  research
and  development related to the development of new  products  and
improvements are expensed by the Company.

Environmental Matters

      The  Company  and  its operations are subject  to  numerous
Environmental  Laws and to other federal, state  and  local  laws
regarding   health  and  safety  matters  ("Health  Laws").    In
particular, the manufacture and distribution of chemical products
are  activities  which  entail  environmental  risks  and  impose
obligations  under the Environmental Laws and  the  Health  Laws,
many   of  which  provide  for  substantial  fines  and  criminal
sanctions for violations. There can be no assurance that material
costs  or  liabilities will not be incurred  by  the  Company  in
complying  with  such laws or in paying fines  or  penalties  for
violation  of such laws.  The Environmental Laws and Health  Laws
and  enforcement  policies thereunder relating  to  the  Chemical
Business  have  in  the past resulted, and could  in  the  future
result,   in  penalties,  cleanup  costs,  or  other  liabilities
relating  to the handling, manufacture, use, emission,  discharge
or  disposal  of pollutants or other substances at  or  from  the
Company's  facilities or the use or disposal of  certain  of  its
chemical  products.  Significant expenditures have been  incurred
by  the  Chemical Business at the El Dorado Facility in order  to
comply with the Environmental Laws and Health Laws.  The Chemical
Business will be required to make additional significant site  or
operational  modifications at the El Dorado  Facility,  involving
substantial  expenditures. See "Special Note  Regarding  Forward-
Looking  Statements"; "Management's Discussion  and  Analysis  of
Financial  Condition and Results of Operations-Chemical Business"
and "Legal Proceedings."

      Due  to a consent administrative order ("CAO") entered into
with  the  Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality ("ADEQ"),
the  Chemical Business has installed additional monitoring  wells
at  the El Dorado Facility in accordance with a workplan approved
by  the ADEQ, and submitted the test results to ADEQ. The results
indicated that a risk assessment should be conducted on  nitrates
present  in  the  shallow  groundwater.  The  Chemical  Business'
consultant has completed this risk assessment, and has  forwarded
it to the ADEQ for approval.  The risk assessment concludes that,
although there are contaminants at the El Dorado Facility and  in
the groundwater, the levels of such contaminants at the El Dorado
Facility  and  in the groundwater do not present an  unacceptable
risk  to  human  health  and  the  environment.   Based  on  this
conclusion,  the  Chemical Business' consultant  has  recommended
continued monitoring at the site for five years.

     A second consent order was entered into with ADEQ in August,
1998  (the  "Wastewater Consent Order"). The  Wastewater  Consent
Order  recognizes  the presence of nitrate contamination  in  the
groundwater  and requires the Chemical Business to undertake  on-
site bioremediation, which is currently underway. Upon completion
of  the  waste minimization activities referenced below, a  final
remedy  for groundwater contamination will be selected, based  on
an  evaluation of risk.  There are no known users of  groundwater
in the area, and preliminary risk assessments have not identified
any   risk  that  would  require  additional  remediation.    The
Wastewater  Consent Order included a $183,700 penalty assessment,
of   which  $125,000  will  be  satisfied  over  five  years   at
expenditures   of   $25,000  per  year  for  waste   minimization
activities.   The Chemical Business has documented in  excess  of
$25,000 on expenditures for 1998 and 1999.

      The Wastewater Consent Order also required installation  of
an  interim groundwater treatment system (which is now operating)
and   certain  improvements  in  the  wastewater  collection  and
treatment  system  (discussed below).  Twelve  months  after  all
improvements  are in place, the risk will be reevaluated,  and  a
final  decision  will  be  made  on what  additional  groundwater
remediation, if any, is required.  There can be no assurance that
the risk assessment will be approved by the ADEQ, or that further
work will not be required.

      The  Wastewater  Consent Order also requires  the  Chemical
Business  to undertake a facility wide wastewater evaluation  and
pollutant  source  control program and facility  wide  wastewater
minimization  program.  The program requires that the  subsidiary
complete rainwater drain off studies including engineering design
plans  for  additional water treatment components to be submitted
to the State of Arkansas by August 2000.  The construction of the
additional water treatment components is required to be completed
by  August, 2001 and the El Dorado plant has been mandated to  be
in  compliance  with  the  final effluent  limits  on  or  before
February 2002.  The aforementioned compliance deadlines, however,
are  not  scheduled to commence until after the State of Arkansas
has  issued  a renewal permit establishing new, more  restrictive
effluent   limits.    Alternative  methods  for   meeting   these
requirements  are  continuing  to be  examined  by  the  Chemical
Business.   The  Company  believes,  although  there  can  be  no
assurance,  that any such new effluent limits would  not  have  a
material  adverse  effect  on  the Company.   See  "Special  Note
Regarding  Forward-Looking Statements."  The  Wastewater  Consent
Order  provided that the State of Arkansas will make every effort
to  issue  the  renewal permit by December 1, 1999; however,  the
State  of  Arkansas has delayed issuance of the permit.   Because
the   Wastewater  Consent  Order  provides  that  the  compliance
deadlines may be extended for circumstances beyond the reasonable
control of the Company, and because the State of Arkansas has not
yet  issued the renewal permit, the Company does not believe that
failure  to  meet  the aforementioned compliance  deadlines  will
present  a  material adverse impact.  The State of  Arkansas  has
been  advised that the Company is seeking financing from Arkansas
authorities  for  the  projects  required  to  comply  with   the
Wastewater Consent Order and the Company has requested  that  the
permit  be  further delayed until financing arrangements  can  be
made,  which  requests  have been met to  date.   The  wastewater
program   is   currently  expected  to  require  future   capital
expenditures  of  approximately $10.0 million.  Negotiations  for
securing financing are currently underway.

      Due  to  certain  start-up problems  with  the  DSN  Plant,
including  excess  emissions from various emission  sources,  the
Chemical  Business and the ADEQ entered into certain  agreements,
including  an  administrative consent  order  (the  "Air  Consent
Order") in 1995 to resolve certain of the Chemical Business' past
violations. The Air Consent Order was amended in 1996  and  1997.
The  second  amendment  to  the  Air  Consent  Order  (the  "1997
Amendment") provided for certain stipulated penalties  of  $1,000
per  hour  to  $10,000  per day for continued  off-site  emission
events  and  deferred enforcement for other  alleged  air  permit
violations.  In 1998, a third amendment to the Air Consent  Order
provided  for the stipulated penalties to be reset at $1,000  per
hour  after  ninety  (90) days without any confirmed  events.  In
addition, prior to 1998, the El Dorado Facility was identified as
one of 33 significant violators of the federal Clean Air Act in a
review  of  Arkansas air programs by the EPA Office of  Inspector
General.  The Company is unable to predict the impact, if any, of
such  designation.   See "Special Note Regarding  Forward-Looking
Statements."   Effective May 1, 2000, the Chemical Business  will
be  operating under a new air permit.  This air permit supercedes
all  air-related consent administrative orders other than the Air
Consent Order discussed above.

      During  1998  and  1999,  the  Chemical  Business  expended
approximately  $.7  million  and $.9  million,  respectively,  in
connection  with  compliance  with  federal,  state   and   local
Environmental Laws at its El Dorado Facility, including, but  not
limited  to,  compliance with the Wastewater  Consent  Order,  as
amended.  The Company anticipates that the Chemical Business  may
spend  up  to  $10.0  million  for  future  capital  expenditures
relating  to  environmental control facilities at its  El  Dorado
Facility  to comply with Environmental Laws, including,  but  not
limited  to, the Wastewater Consent Order, as amended, with  $2.0
million being spent in 2000 and the balance being spent in  2001.
No  assurance  can  be made that the actual expenditures  of  the
Chemical  Business for such matters will not exceed the estimated
amounts  by  a  substantial margin, which could have  a  material
adverse  effect on the Company and its financial condition.   The
amount  to be spent during 2000 and 2001 for capital expenditures
related to compliance with Environmental Laws is dependent upon a
variety  of  factors,  including, but not limited  to,  obtaining
financing   through  Arkansas  authorities,  the  occurrence   of
additional releases or threatened releases  into the environment,
or  changes  in the Environmental Laws (or in the enforcement  or
interpretation  by  any  federal or  state  agency  or  court  of
competent  jurisdiction).  See "Special Note  Regarding  Forward-
Looking  Statements." Additional orders from  the  ADEQ  imposing
penalties, or requiring the Chemical Business to spend  more  for
environmental  improvements or curtail production  activities  at
the  El Dorado Facility, could have a material adverse effect  on
the Company.

Item 2.  PROPERTIES

Chemical Business

      The  Chemical  Business  primarily  conducts  manufacturing
operations (i) on 150 acres of a 1,400 acre tract of land located
in  El  Dorado, Arkansas (the "El Dorado Facility"),  (ii)  in  a
facility of approximately 60,000 square feet located on ten acres
of  land  in  Hallowell, Kansas ("Kansas Facility"), (iii)  in  a
mixed  acid  plant  in  Wilmington, North  Carolina  ("Wilmington
Plant"),  and  (iv)  in  a nitric acid plant  in  Baytown,  Texas
("Baytown  Plant").   The  Chemical  Business  owns  all  of  its
manufacturing facilities except the Baytown Plant. The Wilmington
Plant  and  the DSN Plant are subject to mortgages.  The  Baytown
Plant  is  being  leased pursuant to a leveraged  lease  from  an
unrelated third party.

     As of December 31, 1999, the El Dorado Facility was utilized
at approximately 71% of capacity, based on continuous operation.

      The  Chemical  Business operates its Kansas  Facility  from
buildings located on an approximate ten acre site in southeastern
Kansas,   and   a   research  and  testing  facility   comprising
approximately  ten  acres,  including  buildings  and   equipment
thereon, located in southeastern Kansas, which it owns.

      In addition, the Chemical Business distributes its products
through 28 agricultural and explosive distribution centers.   The
Chemical Business currently operates 20 agricultural distribution
centers, with 16 of the centers located in Texas (13 of which the
Company  owns  and  3 of which it leases); 1  center  located  in
Missouri  (leased);  and 3 centers located in Tennessee  (owned).
The  Chemical  Business currently operates 8 domestic  explosives
distribution centers located in Hallowell, Kansas (owned);  Bonne
Terre, Missouri (owned); Poca, West Virginia (leased); Owensboro,
Martin and Combs, Kentucky (leased); Pryor, Oklahoma (leased) and
Dunlap, Tennessee (owned).

Climate Control Business

       The   Climate  Control  Business  conducts  its  fan  coil
manufacturing operations in a facility located in Oklahoma  City,
Oklahoma,  consisting of approximately 265,000 square feet.   The
Company owns this facility subject to a mortgage.  As of December
31,  1999,  the Climate Control Business was using the productive
capacity  of  the  above referenced facility  to  the  extent  of
approximately 84%, based on three, eight-hour shifts per day  and
a five-day week in one department and one and one half eight-hour
shifts per day and a five-day week in all other departments.

      The  Climate Control Business manufactures most of its heat
pump products in a 270,000 square foot facility in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma,  which  it leases from an unrelated party.   The  lease
term  began  March 1, 1988 and expires February  28,  2003,  with
options  to  renew  for additional five-year periods.  The  lease
currently  provides  for the payment of rent  in  the  amount  of
$52,389 per month.  The Company also has an option to acquire the
facility  at  any time in return for the assumption of  the  then
outstanding balance of the lessor's mortgage.  As of December 31,
1999, the productive capacity of this manufacturing operation was
being  utilized to the extent of approximately 82%, based on  two
nine-hour  shifts per day and a five-day week in  one  department
and one eight-hour shift per day and a five-day week in all other
departments.

      All  of  the  properties utilized by  the  Climate  Control
Business  are considered by the Company management to be suitable
and adequate to meet the current needs of that Business.

Industrial Products Business

      The  Company  owns  several buildings, some  of  which  are
subject to mortgages, totaling approximately 360,000 square  feet
located   in  Oklahoma  City  and  Tulsa,  Oklahoma,  which   the
Industrial   Products  Business  uses  for  showrooms,   offices,
warehouse  and manufacturing facilities. The Company also  leases
facilities  in  Middletown,  New  York  containing  approximately
25,000 square feet for manufacturing operations.

     The Industrial Products Business also leases a facility from
an  entity  owned  by  the  immediate  family  of  the  Company's
President,  which facility occupies approximately  30,000  square
feet of warehouse and shop space in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.  The
Industrial Products Business also leases an office in  Europe  to
coordinate its European activities.

      All  of  the properties utilized by the Industrial Products
Business are considered by Company management to be suitable  and
adequate to meet the needs of the Industrial Products Business.

Item 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

      In  1987, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  ("EPA")
notified  one of the Company's subsidiaries, along with  numerous
other  companies, of potential responsibility for clean-up  of  a
waste disposal site in Oklahoma. In 1990, the EPA added the  site
to   the   National  Priorities  List.   Following  the  remedial
investigation  and  feasibility  study,  in  1992  the   Regional
Administrator  of  the EPA signed the Record of Decision  ("ROD")
for the site. The ROD detailed EPA's selected remedial action for
the  site  and estimated the cost of the remedy at $3.6  million.
In  1992, the Company made settlement proposals which would  have
entailed  a  collective payment by the subsidiaries  of  $47,000.
The site owner rejected this offer and proposed a counteroffer of
$245,000 plus a reopener for costs over $12.5 million.   The  EPA
rejected the Company's offer, allocating 60% of the cleanup costs
to  the  potentially  responsible parties and  40%  to  the  site
operator.   The  EPA estimated the total cleanup costs  at  $10.1
million  as  of  February  1993.  The  site  owner  rejected  all
settlements with the EPA, after which the EPA issued an order  to
the  site  owner  to conduct the remedial design/remedial  action
approved for the site. In August, 1997, the site owner issued  an
"invitation  to  settle" to various parties, alleging  the  total
cleanup costs at the site may exceed $22 million.

      No  legal  action has yet been filed.  The  amount  of  the
Company's cost associated with the cleanup of the site is unknown
due  to continuing changes in the estimated total cost of cleanup
of  the  site  and  the percentage of the total waste  which  was
alleged to have been contributed to the site by the Company.   As
of  December 31, 1999, the Company has accrued an amount based on
a   preliminary  settlement  proposal by  the  alleged  potential
responsible parties; however, there is no assurance such proposal
will  be  accepted.  Such amount is not material to the Company's
financial  position or results of operations.  This  estimate  is
subject  to  material  change  in the  near  term  as  additional
information  is  obtained.  The subsidiary's  insurance  carriers
have  been  notified  of  this matter;  however,  the  amount  of
possible coverage, if any, is not yet determinable.

      Arch  Minerals  Corporation, et al. v. ICI Explosives  USA,
Inc.,  et  al.  On May 24, 1996, the plaintiffs filed this  civil
cause  of  action against EDC and five other unrelated commercial
explosives  manufacturers alleging that the defendants  allegedly
violated  certain federal and state antitrust laws in  connection
with  alleged  price fixing of certain explosive products.   This
cause  of action is pending in the United States District  Court,
Southern  District of Indiana.  The plaintiffs are suing  for  an
unspecified  amount  of  damages,  which,  pursuant  to  statute,
plaintiffs   are  seeking  be  trebled,  together   with   costs.
Plaintiffs  are  also  seeking a permanent  injunction  enjoining
defendants  from  further  alleged  anti-competitive  activities.
Based on the information presently available to EDC, EDC does not
believe  that  EDC conspired with any party, including,  but  not
limited  to,  the  five  other  defendants,  to  fix  prices   in
connection  with the sale of commercial explosives.  This  action
has  been consolidated, for discovery purposes only, with several
other  actions in a multi-district litigation proceeding in Utah.
Discovery  in  this  litigation is in process.   EDC  intends  to
vigorously  defend  itself  in this matter.   See  "Special  Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

      ASARCO  v.  ICI, et al.  The U. S. District Court  for  the
Eastern  District  of  Missouri  has  granted  ASARCO  and  other
plaintiffs  in  a  lawsuit  originally  brought  against  various
commercial explosives manufacturers in Missouri, and consolidated
with  other lawsuits in Utah, leave to add EDC as a defendant  in
that  lawsuit.   This lawsuit alleges a national  conspiracy,  as
well   as  a  regional  conspiracy,  directed  against  explosive
customers  in  Missouri and seeks unspecified damages.   EDC  has
been  included  in  this  lawsuit because  it  sold  products  to
customers  in  Missouri during a time in which  other  defendants
have  admitted  to participating in an antitrust conspiracy,  and
because it has been sued in the Arch case discussed above.  Based
on  the  information presently available to  EDC,  EDC  does  not
believe  that  EDC  conspired with any party, to  fix  prices  in
connection  with the sale of commercial explosives.  EDC  intends
to  vigorously  defend itself in this matter.  See "Special  Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

     On August 26, 1999, LSB and EDC were served with a complaint
filed  in  the District Court of the Western District of Oklahoma
by  National  Union Fire Insurance Company, seeking  recovery  of
certain  insurance premiums totaling $2,085,800 plus  prejudgment
interest, costs and attorneys fees alleged to be due and owing by
LSB and EDC, related to National Union insurance policies for LSB
and subsidiaries dating from 1979 through 1988.

     The  parties entered into an agreement to settle this matter
in 1999, whereby LSB paid $200,000 in December 1999 and agreed to
pay  an  additional $300,000 to National Union.  The $300,000  is
payable annually in installments of $100,000 plus interest.  As a
part  of  the  agreement to settle this matter, the parties  have
agreed to adjudicate whether any additional amounts may be due to
National  Union, but the parties have agreed that  the  Company's
liability for any additional amounts due National Union shall not
exceed  $650,000.   Amounts  expected  to  be  paid  under   this
settlement by EDC were fully accrued at December 31, 1999.

Item 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     Not applicable.















Item 4A.  EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

Identification of Executive Officers

     The following table identifies the executive officers of the
     Company.

                           Position and             Served as
                           Offices with             an Officer
Name                Age    the Company                 from

Jack E. Golsen      71     Board Chairman         December, 1968
                           and President

Barry  H.  Golsen   49     Board Vice Chairman    August, 1981
                           and President of the
                           Climate Control
                           Business

David  R.  Goss     59     Senior  Vice           March, 1969
                           President of
                           Operations and
                           Director

Tony  M.  Shelby    58     Senior  Vice           March, 1969
                           President - Chief
                           Financial Officer,
                           and Director

Jim  D.  Jones      58     Vice President  -      April, 1977
                           Treasurer and
                           Corporate Controller

David  M.  Shear    40     Vice President  and    March, 1990
                           General Counsel


     The Company's officers serve one-year terms, renewable on an
annual  basis by the Board of Directors.  All of the  individuals
listed above have served in substantially the same capacity  with
the Company and/or its subsidiaries for the last five years.   In
March  1996,  the Company executed an employment  agreement  (the
"Agreement")  with Jack E. Golsen for an initial  term  of  three
years followed by two additional three year terms.  The Agreement
automatically renews for each successive three year  term  unless
terminated by either the Company or Jack E. Golsen giving written
notice  at  least one year prior to the expiration  of  the  then
three year term.

Family Relationships

     The only family relationship that exists among the executive
officers  of the Company is that Jack E. Golsen is the father  of
Barry H. Golsen.

                             PART II

Item 5.   MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
          STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

     Currently the Company's Common Stock trades on the Over-the-
Counter  Bulletin  Board ("OTC").  Prior to  July  6,  1999,  the
Company's  Common  Stock traded on the New York  Stock  Exchange,
Inc.  ("NYSE").  The  following  table  shows,  for  the  periods
indicated,  the  high  and  low  closing  sales  prices  for  the
Company's  Common Stock through June 30, 1999 and  from  July  1,
1999  through December 31, 1999 the high and low bid  information
for the Company's Common Stock.

                         Fiscal Year Ended
                             December 31,

                                 1999                1998

            Quarter         High     Low       High      Low

            First           3 3/8    2 9/16    4 1/2     3 13/16
            Second          2 3/4    1 1/4     4 9/16    3 13/16
            Third           1 7/8    1 1/8     4 3/8     3 1/8
            Fourth          1 3/4      9/16    3 9/16    2 15/16


Stockholders

     As of April 7, 2000, the Company had 945 record holders of
its Common Stock.

Other Information

      The  Company's  Common  Stock  and  its  $3.25  Convertible
Exchangeable  Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2  (the  "Series  2
Preferred")  are  currently listed for trading on  the  Over-the-
Counter  Bulletin  Board  ("OTC").   Prior  to  July,  1999,  the
Company's  Common  Stock traded on the New York  Stock  Exchange,
Inc.   ("NYSE").   However,  the  Company  fell  below  the  NYSE
continued  listing criteria for net tangible assets available  to
the  holders  of  the Company's Common Stock and the  three  year
average  net income.  Therefore, the Company's Common  Stock  and
Series  2 Preferred were unable to continue to be listed  on  the
NYSE.

Dividends

      Under the terms of loan agreements between the Company  and
its  lenders, the Company may, so long as no event of default has
occurred  and  is  continuing  under  the  loan  agreement,  make
currently   scheduled  dividends  and  pay   dividends   on   its
outstanding  Preferred  Stock and pay  annual  dividends  on  its
Common Stock equal to $.06 per share.

      The  Company  is  a holding company and,  accordingly,  its
ability  to  pay cash dividends on its Preferred  Stock  and  its
Common  Stock is dependent in large part on its ability to obtain
funds from its subsidiaries.  The ability of the Company's wholly-
owned  subsidiary  ClimaChem,  Inc.  ("ClimaChem")  (which   owns
substantially  all  of  the  companies  comprising  the  Chemical
Business  and  the Climate Control Business) and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries  to pay dividends and to make distributions  to  the
Company  is  restricted  by certain covenants  contained  in  the
Indenture of Senior Unsecured Notes to which they are parties.

      Under the terms of the Indenture of Senior Unsecured Notes,
ClimaChem  cannot transfer funds to the Company in  the  form  of
cash dividends or other distributions or advances, except for (i)
the  amount of taxes that ClimaChem would be required to  pay  if
they  were  not consolidated with the Company and (ii) an  amount
not  to exceed fifty percent (50%) of ClimaChem's cumulative  net
income  from  January 1, 1998 through the end of the  period  for
which  the  calculation is made for the purpose  of  proposing  a
payment,  and(iii)  the amount of direct and indirect  costs  and
expenses  incurred by the Company on behalf of ClimaChem pursuant
to   a  certain  services  agreement  and  a  certain  management
agreement  to  which ClimaChem and the Company are parties.   For
1999, ClimaChem had a net loss of $19.2 million.  See Note  8  of
Notes   to   Consolidated  Financial  Statements   and   Item   7
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  and
Results of Operations".

      Under the loan agreements discussed in Item 7 "Management's
Discussion  and  Analysis of Financial Condition and  Results  of
Operations"  included elsewhere in this report, the  Company  and
its  subsidiaries, exclusive of the Automotive Products  Business
and ClimaChem and its subsidiaries, have the right to borrow on a
revolving  basis up to $6 million, based on eligible  collateral.
At  December  31, 1999, the Company and its subsidiaries,  except
ClimaChem  and its subsidiaries, had availability for  additional
borrowings  of $.1 million.  See Item 7 "Management's  Discussion
and  Analysis  of Financial Condition and Results of  Operations"
for  a  discussion of the financial covenants and  amendments  to
loan agreements during the first quarter of 2000.

      Holders  of  the  Company's Common Stock  are  entitled  to
receive dividends only when, as, and if declared by the Board  of
Directors.  No cash dividends may be paid on the Company's Common
Stock  until  all required dividends are paid on the  outstanding
shares  of the Company's Preferred Stock, or declared and amounts
set  apart  for  the  current period, and, if  cumulative,  prior
periods.   The Company has issued and outstanding as of  December
31,  1999, 915,000 shares of $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class
C  Preferred Stock, Series 2 ("Series 2 Preferred"), 1,462 shares
of  a  series of Convertible Non Cumulative Preferred Stock ("Non
Cumulative  Preferred Stock") and 20,000 shares of Series  B  12%
Convertible,  Cumulative Preferred Stock ("Series B  Preferred").
Each  share of Preferred Stock is entitled to receive  an  annual
dividend,  if,  as and when declared by the Board  of  Directors,
payable as follows:  (i) Series 2 Preferred at the rate of  $3.25
a  share  payable  quarterly in arrears on  March  15,  June  15,
September 15 and December 15, which dividend is cumulative,  (ii)
Non  Cumulative  Preferred Stock at the rate of  $10.00  a  share
payable  April  1, and (iii) Series B Preferred at  the  rate  of
$12.00  a  share payable January 1, which dividend is cumulative.
Due  to  losses  sustained  by  the  Company  and  the  Company's
subsidiaries (other than ClimaChem and its subsidiaries)  limited
borrowing  ability under the Company's revolving loan agreements,
the  Company's  Board of Directors discontinued payment  of  cash
dividends  on its Common Stock for periods subsequent to  January
1, 1999, until the Board of Directors determines otherwise.  Also
due to the Company's losses and the Company's liquidity position,
the  Company  has  not declared or paid the September  15,  1999,
December  15,  1999  and  the March 15, 2000,  regular  quarterly
dividend  of  $.8125 (or $743,438 per quarter) on its outstanding
Series 2 Preferred.  In addition, the Company did not declare  or
pay  the  January 1, 2000 regular annual dividend of  $12.00  (or
$240,000)  on  the Series B Preferred.  The unpaid  dividends  in
arrears  on  the  Company's outstanding Series  2  Preferred  and
Series  B  Preferred  are  cumulative.   No  dividends  or  other
distributions,  other  than dividends payable  in  Common  Stock,
shall  be declared or paid, and no purchase, redemption or  other
acquisition  shall be made, by the Company of  or  in  connection
with  any shares of Common Stock until all cumulative and  unpaid
dividends on the Series 2 Preferred and Series B Preferred  shall
have  been  paid.  As of March 31, 2000, the aggregate amount  of
unpaid  dividends in arrears on the Company's Series 2  Preferred
totaled   approximately  $2.2  million.  The  Company  does   not
anticipate having funds available to pay dividends on  its  stock
(Common  or  Preferred) for the foreseeable future.  See  Item  7
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  and
Results  of  Operations  - Liquidity and Capital  Resources"  for
further  discussion of the Company's payment of  cash  dividends.
Also  see  Notes  3,  10,  11  and 12 of  Notes  to  Consolidated
Financial Statements.

      Whenever  dividends on the Series 2 Preferred shall  be  in
arrears  and unpaid, whether or not declared, in amount equal  to
at least six quarterly dividends (whether or not consecutive) (i)
the  number  of members of the Company's Board of Directors  (the
"Board") shall be increased by two, effective as of the  time  of
election of such directors as hereinafter provided, and (ii)  the
holders of the Series 2 Preferred (voting separately as a  class)
will  have  the  exclusive right to vote for and  elect  the  two
additional   directors  of  the  Company  at   any   meeting   of
stockholders of the Company at which directors are to be  elected
held  during  the  period  that any dividends  on  the  Series  2
Preferred  remain in arrears.  The right of the  holders  of  the
Series  2  Preferred  to vote for such two  additional  directors
shall  terminate,  subject  to  re-vesting  in  the  event  of  a
subsequent  similar  arrearage, when all  cumulative  and  unpaid
dividends  on the Series 2 Preferred have been declared  and  set
apart  for  payment.   The term of office  of  all  directors  so
elected  by the holders of the Series 2 Preferred shall terminate
immediately upon the termination of the right of the  holders  of
the Series 2 Preferred to vote for such two additional directors,
subject to the requirements of Delaware law.

      On  January  5,  1999,  the Company's  Board  of  Directors
approved  the  renewal of the Company's then  existing  Preferred
Share  Purchase  Rights  Plan  (with certain  exceptions),  which
existing  plan  terminated effective as  of  February  27,  1999,
through the execution and delivery of a Renewed Rights Agreement,
dated  January  6, 1999, which expires January 6, 2009  ("Renewed
Rights  Plan").   The  Company issued  the  rights,  among  other
reasons,   in   order  to  assure  that  all  of  the   Company's
stockholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of any
proposed  takeover  of the Company and to guard  against  partial
tender  abusive  tactics to gain control  of  the  Company.   The
rights under the Renewed Rights Plan (the "Renewed Rights")  will
become  exercisable only if a person or group acquires beneficial
ownership  of  20%  or  more  of the Company's  Common  Stock  or
announces  a tender or exchange offer the consummation  of  which
would result in the ownership by a person or group of 20% or more
of  the  Common  Stock, except pursuant to a tender  or  exchange
offer  which is for all outstanding shares of Common Stock  at  a
price  and on terms which a majority of outside directors of  the
Board  of  Directors determines to be adequate and  in  the  best
interest  of  the Company in which the Company, its  stockholders
and   other   relevant  constituencies,  other  than  the   party
triggering  the rights (a "Permitted Offer"), except acquisitions
by  the  following excluded persons (collectively, the  "Excluded
Persons"):  (i) the Company, (ii) any subsidiary of the  Company,
(iii)   any  employee  benefit  plan  of  the  Company   or   its
subsidiaries,  (iv)  any  entity  holding  Common  Stock  for  or
pursuant  to  the  employee benefit plan of the  Company  or  its
subsidiary,  (v)  Jack  E.  Golsen, Chairman  of  the  Board  and
President  of  the Company, his spouse and children  and  certain
related  trusts  and  entities, (vi) any party  who  becomes  the
beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Common Stock solely  as  a
result  of the acquisition of Common Stock by the Company, unless
such  party  shall,  after such share purchase  by  the  Company,
become the beneficial owner of additional shares of Common  Stock
constituting 1% or more of the then outstanding shares of  Common
Stock,  and  (vii) any party whom the Board of Directors  of  the
Company  determines in good faith acquired 20%  or  more  of  the
Common  Stock  inadvertently and such person  divests  within  10
business  days after such determination, a sufficient  number  of
shares of Common Stock and no longer beneficially own 20% of  the
Common Stock.

     Each Renewal Rights, when triggered, (other than the Renewal
Rights, owned by the acquiring person or members of a group  that
causes  the  Renewal Rights to become exercisable,  which  became
void) will entitle the stockholder to buy one one-hundredth of  a
share  of  a  new series of participating Preferred Stock  at  an
exercise price of $20.00 per share.  Each one one-hundredth of  a
share of the new Preferred Stock purchasable upon the exercise of
a  right has economic terms designed to approximate the value  of
one  share  of the Company's Common Stock.  If another person  or
group  acquires  the  Company  in  a  merger  or  other  business
combination  transaction, each Renewal  Right  will  entitle  its
holder  (other than Renewal Rights owned by the person  or  group
that  causes  the  Renewal  Rights to become  exercisable,  which
become  void)  to  purchase at the Renewal Right's  then  current
exercise price, a number of the acquiring company's common shares
which  at the time of such transaction would have a market  value
two  times the exercise price of the Renewal Right.  In addition,
if  a  person or group (with certain exceptions) acquires 20%  or
more  of  the  Company's outstanding Common Stock,  each  Renewal
Right  will  entitle  its holder (other than the  Renewal  Rights
owned  by  the  acquiring person or members  of  the  group  that
results in the Renewal Rights becoming exercisable, which  become
void)  to  purchase at the Renewal Right's then current  exercise
price, a number of shares of the Company's Common Stock having  a
market value of twice the Renewal Right's exercise price in  lieu
of the new Preferred Stock.

     Following the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial
ownership  of  20%  or more of the Company's  outstanding  Common
Stock  (with  certain exceptions) and prior to an acquisition  of
50% or more of the Company's Common Stock by the person or group,
the  Board  of  Directors may exchange the Renewal Rights  (other
than  Renewal Rights owned by the acquiring person or members  of
the   group   that   results  in  the  Renewal  Rights   becoming
exercisable, which become void), in whole or in part, for  shares
of  the Company's Common Stock.  That exchange would occur at  an
exchange ratio of one share of Common Stock, or one one-hundredth
of  a  share of the new series of participating Preferred  Stock,
per Renewal Right.

      Prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial
ownership  of  20%  or more of the Company's Common  Stock  (with
certain exceptions) the Company may redeem the Renewal Rights for
one  cent per Renewal Right at the option of the Company's  Board
of  Directors.   The Company's Board of Directors  also  has  the
authority to reduce the 20% thresholds to not less than 10%.


Item 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (1)

                                         Years ended December 31,
                                   1999      1998      1997      1996      1995

                                              (Dollars in Thousands,
                                             except per share data)
                                                            
Selected Statement of Operations Data:

   Net sales                     $261,697   $270,042  $278,430  $269,213  $234,121

   Total revenues                $262,733   $271,332  $283,597  $275,998  $240,861

   Interest expense              $ 15,441   $ 14,938  $ 12,155  $  8,280  $  8,929

   Income (loss) from continuing
     operations before extraordinary
     charge                      $(31,646)  $  2,439  $ (8,755) $  1,944  $  1,144

   Net loss                      $(49,767)  $ (1,920) $(23,065) $ (3,845) $ (3,732)

   Net loss applicable
     to common stock             $(52,995)  $ (5,149) $(26,294) $ (7,074) $ (6,961)

   Basic and diluted loss
     per common share:
       Loss from continuing
        operations before extraordinary
        charge                   $  (2.95)  $   (.07) $  (.93)    $  (.10) $  (.16)

     Losses on discontinued
      operations                 $  (1.53)  $   (.35) $  (.75)    $  (.45) $  (.38)

     Net loss                    $  (4.48)  $   (.42) $  (2.04)   $  (.55) $  (.54)



Item 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Continued) (1)

                                               Years ended December 31,
                                     1999      1998      1997      1996      1995
                                                (Dollars in Thousands,
                                                except per share data)
                                                              
Selected Balance Sheet Data:

  Total assets                     $188,635  $223,250  $244,600  $233,703   $217,860


  Long-term debt, including current
       portion                     $158,072  $150,506  $160,903  $109,023   $102,472

  Redeemable preferred stock       $    139  $    139  $    146  $    146   $    149

  Stockholders' equity (deficit)   $(14,173) $ 35,059  $ 44,496  $ 74,018   $ 81,576

Selected other data:
  Cash dividends declared
    per common share               $      -  $    .02  $    .06  $    .06   $    .06


(1)  On April 5, 2000, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan of
     disposal of the Company's Automotive Products Business.  Accordingly, all
     amounts have been restated to reflect the  Automotive Products Business as
     a discontinued operation for all periods presented.  See Note 4 of Notes to
     Consolidated Financial Statements.


Item 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
       CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

          The    following    Management's   Discussion    and    Analysis    of
Financial   Condition   and   Results  of   Operations   should   be   read   in
conjunction   with   a   review   of   the   Company's   December    31,    1999
Consolidated    Financial    Statements,    Item    6    "SELECTED     FINANCIAL
DATA" and Item 1 "BUSINESS" included elsewhere in this report.

           Certain     statements     contained    in     this     "Management's
Discussion    and   Analysis   of   Financial   Conditions   and   Results    of
Operations"     may     be    deemed    forward-looking     statements.      See
"Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".

       All   discussions   below   are  that  of   the   Businesses   continuing
and     accordingly    exclude    the    Discontinued    operations    of    the
Automotive     Products    Business    and    the    Australian     subsidiary's
operations   sold  in  1999.   See  Notes  4  and  5  of  the   Notes   to   the
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Overview

General

         For   the   year   ended  December  31,  1999,  the   Company   had   a
net    loss    applicable    to    common   stock   of    approximately    $53.0
million,   as   compared  to  a  net  loss  applicable  to   common   stock   of
approximately   $5.1   million   for  the  year   ended   December   31,   1998.
The   loss   for   the   year   ended  December   31,   1999   from   continuing
operations    was    approximately    $31.6    million    (income    of     $2.4
million   in   1998).    The  Company  is  pursuing  a  strategy   of   focusing
on    its   core   businesses   and   concentrating   on   product   lines    in
niche   markets   where   the   Company   has   established   or   believes   it
can   establish   a   position   as  a  market   leader.    In   addition,   the
Company   is   seeking   to   improve   its  liquidity   and   profits   through
liquidation   of   selected  assets  that  are  on   its   balance   sheet   and
on   which   it   is   not  realizing  an  acceptable  return   and   does   not
reasonably   expect   to  do  so.  In  this  regard,  the   Company   has   come
to    the    conclusion   that   its   Industrial   and   Automotive    Products
Businesses are non-core to the Company.

        On    April    5,   2000,   the   Board   of   Directors   approved    a
definitive   plan   to   dispose   of   the   Company's   Automotive    Products
Business.    The   plan   allows  the  Company  to   focus   its   efforts   and
financial   resources  on  its  core  businesses.   In   an   effort   to   make
the   Automotive   Products  Business  viable  so   that   it   can   be   sold,
on    March    9,    2000,    the   Automotive   Products   Business    acquired
certain    assets   of   the   Zeller   Corporation   ("Zeller")    representing
Zeller's    universal    joint    business.     In    connection    with     the
acquisition    of    these    assets,   the   Automotive    Products    Business
assumed   an   aggregate   of   approximately  $7.5   million   (unaudited)   in
Zeller's   liabilities,   $4.7   million   of   which   was   funded   by    the
Automotive   Products   Business  primary   lender.    (The   balance   of   the
assumed    liabilities   is   expected   to   be   funded   out    of    working
capital    of    the   Automotive   Products   Business).    For   year    ended
December   31,   1999,   the   universal   joint   business   of   Zeller    had
unaudited   sales   of  approximately  $11.7  million  and   a   net   loss   of
$1.5 million.

       In   connection   with   the  Automotive  Products   Business   plan   of
disposal,   the   Company's  Board  of  Directors  approved  a   sale   of   the
Business   to   an   identified   third  party,   subject   to   completion   of
certain     conditions     (including    approval    from     the     Automotive
Products   Business'   primary   lender).    It   is   anticipated   that   this
sale   will   be   completed  by  June  30,  2000.   Upon  completion   of   the
sale   of   the   Automotive   Products  Business,  the   Company   expects   to
receive    notes    receivable    in   the   approximate    amount    of    $8.0
million,   such   notes  being  secured  by  a  second  lien   on   the   assets
of    the    Automotive    Products   Business.    These    notes,    and    any
payments   of   principal   and   interest,  thereon,   will   be   subordinated
to   the   buyer's   primary  lender  (which  is  the  same   lender   that   is
the   current   primary   lender   to   the   Automotive   Products   Business).
LSB   will   receive   no   principal  payments  under   the   notes   for   the
first    two   years   following   the   sale   of   the   Automotive   Products
Business.    In   addition,   the   buyer   will   assume   substantially    all
of   the   Automotive   Products   Business'  debts   and   obligations,   which
at    December   31,   1999,   prior   to   the   Zeller   acquisition   totaled
$22.2 million.

       The  notes  to  be  received  by  the  Company  will  be  secured  by   a
lien   on   all  of  the  assets  of  the  buyer  and  its  subsidiaries,   with
the    notes   to   be   received   by   the   Company   and   liens    securing
payment   of   all   of   the  notes  subordinated  to   the   buyer's   primary
lender    and   will   be   subject   to   any   liens   outstanding   on    the
assets.    As   of   March   31,   2000,  the   Automotive   Products   Business
owes   its   primary   lender   approximately   $14.0   million.    After    the
sale,    the    Company    will   also   remain   a   guarantor    on    certain
equipment    notes    of    the    Automotive    Products    Business     (which
equipment    notes   have   an   outstanding   principal   balance    of    $4.5
million   as  of  March  31,  2000)  and  will  continue  to  guaranty   up   to
$1   million   of   the  revolving  credit  facility  of  the   buyer,   as   it
did   for   its   Automotive   Products  Business.    If   the   sale   of   the
Automotive     Products    Business    is    completed,     there     are     no
assurances   that   the  Company  will  be  able  to  collect   on   the   notes
issued to the Company as consideration for the purchase.

       The   Company   has   classified  its  investment   in   the   Automotive
Products     Business     as     a     discontinued     operation,     reserving
approximately    $7.9    million   in   1999.     This    reserve    does    not
include   the   loss,   if   any,  which  may   result   if   the   Company   is
required to perform on its guaranties described above.

       For   the   twelve   month   period  ended  December   31,   1999,   1998
and   1997,   the   Automotive  Products  Business  had   revenues   of   $33.4,
$40.0   and   $35.5  million,  respective  and  a  net  loss  of   $18.1,   $4.4
and    $9.7    million    respectively.    See    Note    4    to    Notes    to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

          During   August   1999,   the   Company's   Chemical   Business   sold
substantially    all    of   the   assets   of   its   Australian    subsidiary.
Revenues   for   1999  to  the  date  of  the  sale  of  the   assets   of   the
Australian   subsidiary   were  $7.5  million  and   the   loss   sustained   by
the   Australian   subsidiary  was  $2.0  million,   excluding   the   loss   of
$2.0 million as a result of the sale.

          Included    in   the   Company's   loss   for   1999   is    a    loss
provision   of   $8.4   million  as  discussed  in   Note   16   of   Notes   to
Consolidated    Financial   Statements   and   elsewhere    in    the    report.
This   loss   provision   was  caused,  in  part  by  the   Chemical   Business'
requirements   to   buy   a   large  percentage   of   its   anhydrous   ammonia
requirements   (its   primary   raw   material)   at   prices   in   excess   of
the    then    market    price   and   the   oversupply   of    nitrate    based
products   in   1999   caused,   in  part,  by  the   importation   of   Russian
anhydrous   ammonia   at   prices   substantially   below   the   then    market
price,   resulting   in   the   Chemical   Business   costs   to   produce   its
nitrate    based    products    exceeding   the    then    anticipated    future
sales prices.

        During    1999,    the    Chemical   Business   had    commitments    to
purchase    anhydrous   ammonia   under   three   contracts.    The    Company's
purchase   price   of   anhydrous  ammonia  under   one   of   these   contracts
could   be   higher   or   lower  than  the  current  market   spot   price   of
anhydrous    ammonia.     Pricing   is   subject   to    variations    due    to
numerous   factors   contained  in  this  contract.   Based   on   the   pricing
index   contained   in   this   contract,   prices   paid   during   1998    and
1999    were    substantially   higher   than   the    current    market    spot
price.    As   of   December   31,   1999,   the   Chemical   Business   is   to
purchase   96,000   tons   at   a   minimum   of   2,000   tons   of   anhydrous
ammonia   per   month   during  2000  and  3,000  tons   per   month   in   2001
and   2002   under   this   contract.    In   addition,   under   the   contract
the    Company    is    committed   to   purchase   50%   of    its    remaining
requirements   of   anhydrous   ammonia   through   2002   from    this    third
party    at    prices   which   approximate   market   prices.   The    purchase
price(s)   the   Chemical   Business  will  be   required   to   pay   for   the
remaining    96,000   tons   of   anhydrous   ammonia   under   this    contract
currently   exceeds   and  is  expected  to  continue   to   exceed   the   spot
market    prices   throughout   the   purchase   period.    Additionally,    the
excess   supply   of  nitrate  based  products,  caused,   in   part,   by   the
import   of   Russian   nitrate,   caused   a   significant   decline   in   the
sales   prices;   although   sales   prices   have   improved   in   2000    (no
improvement   in   sales  margins  is  expected  in  the  near   term   due   to
increased   cost   of   anhydrous   ammonia).   During   1999,   this    decline
in    sales    price    resulted   in   the   cost    of    anhydrous    ammonia
purchased    under    this   contract   when   combined    with    manufacturing
and     distribution    costs,    to    exceed    anticipated    future    sales
prices.     As    a    result,    the   accompanying   Consolidated    Financial
Statements    included    a    loss    provision    of    approximately     $8.4
million   for   anhydrous   ammonia  required  to  be   purchased   during   the
remainder     of    the    contract    ($7.4    million    remaining     accrued
liability   as   of   December   31,  1999).   The   provision   for   loss   at
December    31,    1999   was   based   on   the   forward   contract    pricing
existing   at   June   30,  1999  and  September  30,   1999   (the   date   the
provisions    were    recognized),   and    estimated    market    prices    for
products   to   be   manufactured  and  sold  during  the   remainder   of   the
contract.   There   are   no   assurances  that  such   estimates   will   prove
to    be   accurate.    Differences,   if   any,   in   the   estimated   future
cost   of   anhydrous   ammonia  and  the  actual  cost   in   effect   at   the
time   of   purchase   and   differences   in   the   estimated   sales   prices
and   actual   sales   prices   of  products  manufactured   could   cause   the
Company's    operating    results   to   differ   from    that    estimate    in
arriving at the loss provision recorded during 1999.

         The   Chemical   Business   is  a  member   of   an   organization   of
domestic    fertilizer    grade   ammonium   nitrate    producers    which    is
seeking   relief   from   unfairly   low  priced   Russian   ammonium   nitrate.
This   industry   group  filed  a  petition  in  July   1999   with   the   U.S.
International     Trade    Commission    and    the    U.S.    Department     of
Commerce    seeking   an   antidumping   investigation   and,   if    warranted,
relief    from   Russian   dumping.    The   International   Trade    Commission
has    rendered    a    favorable   preliminary    determination    that    U.S.
producers   of   ammonium   nitrate  have  been   injured   as   a   result   of
Russian     ammonium    nitrate    imports.     In    addition,     the     U.S.
Department    of    Commerce    has    issued    a    preliminary    affirmative
determination   that   the   Russian  imports   were   sold   at   prices   that
are   264.59%   below   their  fair  market  value.   As   a   result   of   the
Commerce    Department's   preliminary   ruling,   all   imports   of    Russian
ammonium    nitrate    are   currently   subject   to   potential    antidumping
duty   liability.    The   Department  of   Commerce   is   due   to   issue   a
final   determination   by   May   22,  2000   and   the   International   Trade
Commission   by   July   5,   2000.   The  relief  currently   in   place   will
remain      only     if     both     agencies     make     final     affirmative
determinations.      It    is    not    known,    therefore,     whether     the
antidumping   action   will  be  successful  upon   conclusion   of   the   U.S.
Government's Investigation.

          The   Company's   financial   statements   have   been   restated   to
reflect     the    Automotive    Products    Business    as    a    discontinued
operation   for   all   periods  presented.   As  a   result,   the   Automotive
Products   Business   is   no  longer  presented  as   a   reportable   segment.
Restated    Automotive   Products   Business   results    are    presented    as
losses    from    discontinued   operations,   net    of    applicable    income
taxes,     and    exclude    general    corporate    overhead    and     certain
interest    charges,    previously   allocated   to    that    business.     The
discussions    and    figures    below    are    based    on    this    restated
presentation.    Certain   statements   contained   in   this    Overview    are
forward-looking     statements,    and    future    results     could     differ
materially from such statements.
       The   following   table   contains  certain  of  the   information   from
Note    17    of    Notes    to    the    Company's    Consolidated    Financial
Statements    about    the   Company's   operations   in   different    industry
segments   for   each  of  the  three  years  in  the  period   ended   December
31, 1999.
                                       1999          1998        1997
                                                  (In thousands)
Net sales:
 Businesses continuing:
  Chemical                         $128,154        $125,757    $130,467
  Climate Control                   117,055         115,786     105,909
  Industrial Products                 9,027          14,315      15,572
                                    ____________________________________
                                   $254,236        $255,858    $251,948

Business disposed of - Chemical (1)   7,461          14,184      26,482
                                   ______________________________________
                                   $261,697        $270,042    $278,430
                                   ______________________________________
                                   ______________________________________

Gross Profit: (2)
 Businesses continuing:
  Chemical                         $ 13,532        $ 18,570    $ 16,171
  Climate Control                    35,467          32,278      29,552
  Industrial Products                 1,757           3,731       3,776
                                   _____________________________________
                                   $ 50,756        $ 54,579    $ 49,499
                                   _____________________________________
                                   _____________________________________

Operating Profit (loss): (3)
 Businesses continuing:
  Chemical                         $  1,325        $  6,592    $  5,531
  Climate Control                     9,751          10,653       8,895
  Industrial Products                (2,507)           (403)       (993)
                                  _______________________________________
                                      8,569          16,842      13,433

 Business disposed of -
   Chemical (1)                      (1,632)         (2,467)        (52)
                                  _________________________________________
                                      6,937          14,375      13,381
General corporate and other
 expenses, net                       (8,449)         (9,891)     (9,931)
Interest expense:
 Business disposed of (1)              (326)           (434)       (720)
 Businesses continuing              (15,115)        (14,504)    (11,435)
Gain (loss) on businesses
   disposed of                       (1,971)         12,993           -
Provision for loss on firm purchase
 commitments - Chemical              (8,439)              -           -
Provision for impairment on long-lived
 Assets - Chemical                   (4,126)              -           -
                                   ________________________________________
Income (loss) from continuing
 operations before provision for
 income taxes and extraordinary
 charge                            $(31,489)      $   2,539     $ (8,705)
                                   ________________________________________
                                   ________________________________________

Total assets:
 Businesses continuing:
  Chemical                         $ 93,482        $107,780     $117,671
  Climate Control                    65,521          49,516       49,274
  Industrial Products                 8,203          11,662        9,929
  Corporate assets and other         21,429          22,137       32,894
 Business disposed of - Chemical          -          16,797       19,899
 Net assets of discontinued operations    -          15,358       14,933
                                   _______________________________________
Total assets                       $188,635        $223,250     $244,600
                                   ________________________________________
                                   ________________________________________

(1)  In August, 1999, the Company sold substantially all the
    assets of its wholly owned Australian subsidiary.  See Note
    5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
    information.  The operating results have been presented
    separately in the above table.

(2) Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less
    cost of sales.

(3) Operating profit (loss) by industry segment represents
    revenues less operating expenses before deducting general
    corporate and other expenses, interest expense, income
    taxes, loss on business disposed of and provision for loss
    on firm purchase commitments and impairment on long-lived
    assets in 1999 and gain on sale of an office building (the
    "Tower") in 1998.

 Chemical Business

       Net   Sales   in   the  Chemical  Business  (excluding   the   Australian
subsidiary   in   which   substantially  all  of  its   assets   were   disposed
of    in    August,   1999)   were   $128.2   million   for   the   year   ended
December   31,   1999   and  $125.8  million  for  the   year   ended   December
31,   1998.   The   sales   volume  from  the  Chemical  Business'   El   Dorado
Plant   was   down  substantially  in  1999  (535,000  tons)   from   the   1998
level   615,000   tons.    This  decline  in  sales   volume   was   offset   by
sales   from   the   EDNC   Baytown   Plant  completed   in   May,   1999   (See
Item   1   "Business"   included   elsewhere  in   this   report).   The   gross
profit   (excluding   the   Australian  subsidiary   and   the   provision   for
loss   on   firm   purchase  commitments)  decreased  to   $13.5   million   (or
10.6%   of   net   sales)  in  1999  from  $18.6  million  (or  14.8%   of   net
sales)   in   1998.   The  decrease  in  the  gross  profit  was   primarily   a
result   of   lower   volumes  and  declining  sales   prices   and   unabsorbed
overhead    resulting    from    the    lower    volumes    and    manufacturing
costs.

       During   the   third   and  fourth  quarters  of   1999,   two   of   the
plants   were   temporarily   shut  down  due  to  the   excessive   supply   of
ammonium    nitrate   at   the   Chemical   Business   and   in    the    market
place.     The   plants   that   were   shut   down   increased   the   Chemical
Business'   losses   due   to   overhead  costs  that   continue   even   though
product   was   not   being   produced   at   the   plants   temporarily    shut
down.   These   plants   have   resumed  production   in   the   first   quarter
of   2000.    There   are  no  assurances  that  the  Chemical   Business   will
not    be    required   to   record   additional   loss   provisions   in    the
future.    Based   on   the   forward  pricing  existing   as   of   March   31,
2000,   the   Chemical  Business  would  not  be  required   to   recognize   an
additional   loss   on   the   anhydrous  ammonia   purchase   contracts.    See
"Special Note regarding Forward Looking Statements".

       In   May,   1999,   a   subsidiary   of   the   Company   completed   its
obligations,   as   an  agent,  pursuant  to  an  agreement   to   construct   a
nitric   acid   plant   located   within   Bayer's   Baytown,   Texas   chemical
plant   complex.    This   plant  is  being  operated  by   a   subsidiary   and
is    supplying    nitric   acid   to   Bayer   under   a    long-term    supply
contract.     Sales   by   this   subsidiary   to   Bayer   were   approximately
$17.2    million   during   1999.    Management   estimates   that,   at    full
production   capacity   based  on  terms  of  the  Agreement   and,   based   on
the   price   of  anhydrous  ammonia  as  of  the  date  of  this  report,   the
plant    should   generate   approximately   $35   million   in   annual   gross
revenues.     Unlike    the   Chemical   Business'   regular    sales    volume,
the   market   risk  on  this  additional  volume  is  much   less   since   the
contract    provides   for   recovery   of   costs,   as   defined,    plus    a
profit.     The    Company's   subsidiary   is   leasing   the    nitric    acid
plant   pursuant   to   a   leverage  lease  from  an  unrelated   third   party
for   an   initial   term  of  ten  (10)  years  which,  began   on   June   23,
1999.  See "Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements".

         The    results    of    operation    of    the    Chemical    Business'
Australian   subsidiary   had   been   adversely   affected   due   to   adverse
economic    developments   in   certain   countries   in   Asia.     As    these
adverse    economic    conditions   in   Asia    continued,    they    had    an
adverse     effect     on    the    Company's    consolidated     results     of
operations.    As   a   result   of  the  economic   conditions   in   Australia
and    the    adverse   effect   of   such   conditions   on    the    Company's
consolidated   results   of   operations,   the   Company   entered   into    an
agreement    to    dispose   of   this   business.    On    August    2,    1999
substantially    all    the    assets    were    sold    and    a    loss     of
approximately   $2.0   million   was  recognized.    See   Note   5   of   Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.

       The   Australian   subsidiary  had  revenues  for   the   calendar   year
1999   up   to  the  date  of  sale  of  $7.5  million  and  a  loss   of   $2.0
million,   excluding   the   loss   on   the   sale.    For   the   year   ended
December   31,   1998,   revenues  were  $14.2  million   and   the   loss   was
$2.9 million.

Climate Control

       The   Climate   Control  Business  manufactures   and   sells   a   broad
range    of    hydronic    fan   coil,   air   handling,    air    conditioning,
heating,    water    source   heat   pumps,   and   dehumidification    products
targeted     to     both    commercial    and    residential    new     building
construction and renovation.

       The   Climate   Control  Business  focuses  on  product  lines   in   the
specific   niche   markets   of   hydronic   fan   coils   and   water    source
heat    pumps   and   has   established   a   significant   market   share    in
these specific markets.

       Sales   of   $117.1   million   for   the   year   ended   December   31,
1999,    in    the   Climate   Control   Business   were   approximately    1.1%
greater   than   sales   of  $115.8  million  for  the   year   ended   December
31,   1998.   The   gross   profit   was   approximately   $35.5   million   and
$32.3   million   in   1999   and   1998,   respectively.   The   gross   profit
percentage   increased   to  30.3%  for  1999  from  27.9%   for   1998.    This
increase   is   primarily   due  to  an  improved   market   and   manufacturing
efficiency    relating   to   the   heat   pump   portion   of    the    Climate
Control Business.

Industrial Products Business

       As   indicated   in   the   above   table,   during   the   years   ended
December   31,   1999   and   1998,  respectively,   the   Industrial   Products
Business    recorded    sales    of   $9.0    million    and    $14.3    million
respectively,   and   reported   operating   losses   of   $2.5   million    and
$.4   million   respectively.    The  net   investment   in   assets   of   this
Business   has   continued   to   decrease   and   the   Company   expects    to
realize further reductions in future periods.

        The    Company   continues   to   eliminate   certain   categories    of
machines   from   the   product   line   by   not   replacing   those   machines
when    sold.     The    Company    previously    announced    that    it     is
evaluating   opportunities   to  sell  or  realize   its   net   investment   in
its    Industrial   Products   Business.    The   terms   of   sale,   if   any,
have    not   been   finalized.    The   sale   of   the   Industrial   Products
Business   is   a   forward  looking  statement  and  is   subject   to,   among
other   things,   the   Company  and  potential   buyer   agreeing   to   terms,
the    buyer's   and   the   Company's   lending   institutions   agreeing    to
the    terms    of    the   transaction,   including   the    purchase    price,
approval   of   the   Company's   Board  of  Directors   and   negotiation   and
finalization    of    definitive   agreements.    There    is    no    assurance
that   the   Company   will  sell  or  realize  its  net   investment   in   the
Industrial Products Business in 2000.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 1999 compared to Year Ended December 31,
1998

Revenues

       Total   revenues   of   Businesses   continuing   for   1999   and   1998
were   $255.3   million   and   $257.1   million,   respectively   (a   decrease
of   $1.8   million).    Sales   decreased  $1.6  million   and   other   income
decreased $.2 million.

Net Sales

       Consolidated   net   sales   of   Businesses   continuing   included   in
total   revenues   for   1999   were  $254.2   million,   compared   to   $255.9
million   for   1998,   a   decrease  of  $1.7  million.    This   decrease   in
sales   resulted   principally   from  decreased   sales   in   the   Industrial
Products    Business   of   $5.3   million   due   to   decreased    sales    of
machine   tools.    This   decrease  was  offset   by:   (i)   increased   sales
in   the   Climate   Control  Business  of  $1.3  million   primarily   due   to
increased   heat   pump   sales   offset  by  production   delays   related   to
mechanical    problems   with   certain   new   equipment   and    (ii)    lower
sales   of   $16.0   million  from  the  Chemical  Business   other   than   the
EDNC   Baytown   Plant   offset  by  sales  by  EDNC  of  $18.4   million   from
the    Baytown   Plant   which   began   operations   in   May   1999.     Lower
volumes   of   the   Company's  nitrogen  based  products   were   sold   at   a
lower    price   in   1999   due   primarily   to   the   import   of    Russian
nitrate   resulting   in   an  over  supply  of  nitrate   based   products   in
the   primary   market   areas   for   the   Chemical   Business'   agricultural
products    (see    Note    16    of    Notes    to    Consolidated    Financial
Statement).

Gross Profit

       Gross   profit   of   Businesses  continuing  as   a   percent   of   net
sales    was   20.0%   for   1999,   compared   to   21.3%   for   1998.     The
decrease    in    the   gross   profit   percentage   was    the    result    of
decreases    in    the    Chemical   and   Industrial    Products    Businesses,
partially   offset   by   the   Climate   Control   Business.    The    decrease
in   the   Chemical   Business  was  primarily  the  result   of   lower   sales
volumes    and    reduced   selling   prices   for   the   Company's    nitrogen
based     products.     See    "Overview    General"    elsewhere    in     this
"Management's    Discussion   and   Analysis   of   Financial   Condition    and
Results    of    Operations"   for   further   discussion   of   the    Chemical
Business'     decreased    sales.     The    decrease    in    the    Industrial
Products    Business   was   primarily   due   to   a   lower    gross    profit
product   mix   of   machine  tools  sold  and  a  $490,000  charge   taken   to
write-down   the   net   carrying   cost   of   certain   inventory   in   1999.
The   decrease   in   the   gross   profit   percentage   was   offset   by   an
increase   in   the   Climate   Control   Business   due   primarily    to    an
improved focus on sales of more profitable product lines.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

        Selling,   general   and   administrative   ("SG&A")   expenses   as   a
percent   of   net   sales   from   Businesses   continuing   for   1999    were
20.3%   compared   to  19.1%  for  1998.   This  increase   is   primarily   the
result   of   decreased  sales  volume  in  the  Chemical   Business   and   the
Industrial     Products     Business    without     equivalent     corresponding
decreases    in   SG&A   and   increased   cost   of   the   Company   sponsored
medical   care   programs   for   its  employees   due   to   increased   health
care    costs.     Additionally,   costs   associated    with    new    start-up
operations    in    1999,    by   the   Climate   Control    Business,    having
minimal   or   no   sales,   contributed  to  the   increase   in   dollars   as
well as expense as a percent of sales.

Interest Expense

        Interest   expense   for   continuing   businesses   of   the    Company
was   $15.1   million   for   1999,  compared  to  $14.5   million   for   1998.
The    increase    of   $.6   million   primarily   resulted   from    increased
borrowings   and   lenders'  prime  rates  during  the  last   half   of   1999.
The     increased    borrowings    were    necessary    to    support    capital
expenditures,   higher   accounts  receivable   balances   and   to   meet   the
operational    requirements    of    the   Company.     See    "Liquidity    and
Capital Resources" of this Management's Discussion and Analysis.
Businesses Disposed of

       The   Company   sold  substantially  all  the  assets  of   its   wholly-
owned    Australian    subsidiary   in   1999.    The    Company    also    sold
certain   real   estate   in  1998.   See  discussion   in   Note   5   of   the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Provision for Loss on Firm Purchase Commitments

        The    Company   had   a   provision   for   loss   on   firm   purchase
commitments   of   $8.4   million  for  the  year  ended   December   31,   1999
to   provide   for   losses   resulting  from  cost   of   remaining   anhydrous
ammonia   to   be   purchased   pursuant  to  the   firm   purchase   commitment
in     the    Chemical    Business,    which    when    combined    with     the
manufacturing    and    distribution    costs    exceeded    the     anticipated
future   sales   price.   See  discussion  in  Note   16   of   the   Notes   to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Provision for Impairment on Long-lived Assets

        The   Company   had   a   provision   for   impairment   on   long-lived
assets   of   $4.1  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,   1999   which
includes   $3.9   million   associated  with  two  out   of   service   chemical
plants   which   are   to   be   sold   or  dismantled.    See   discussion   in
Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income (loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

        The   Company   had   a   loss   from   continuing   operations   before
income   taxes   of   $31.5   million  for  1999   compared   to   income   from
continuing    operations   before   income   taxes   of   $2.5    million    for
1998.    The   decreased   profitability  of   $34.0   million   was   primarily
due   to   the   gain   on   the   sale  of  the  Tower   in   1998   of   $13.0
million,    the    lower    gross    profit   margins    from    the    Chemical
Business,    the   loss   on   disposition   of   the   Australian   subsidiary,
lower    ammonium   nitrate   sales   prices   and   volume,   excluding   EDNC,
from   the   Chemical   Business,  the  provision  for   impairment   on   long-
lived     assets    and    the    provision    for    losses     on     purchase
commitments, as previously discussed.

Provision for Income Taxes

       As   a   result   of  the  Company's  net  operating  loss   carryforward
for   income   tax  purposes  as  discussed  elsewhere  herein   and   in   Note
9    of    Notes   to   Consolidated   Financial   Statements,   the   Company's
provisions   for   income  taxes  for  1999  are  for   current   state   income
taxes   and   1998   are   for   current  state   income   taxes   and   federal
alternative minimum taxes.

Discontinued Operations

       On   April   5,  2000  the  Board  of  Directors  approved  a   plan   of
disposal      of     the     Company's     Automotive     Products      Business
("Automotive").     As    a   result,   Automotive    is    reflected    as    a
discontinued   operations   for   the   periods   presented.    The   net   loss
from    discontinued   operations   of   Automotive   is   $18.1   million    in
1999   and   $4.4   million  in  1998.   The  increase  in  1999   is   due   to
lower   sales   volume  and  profits,  and  the  loss  on  disposal   of   $10.0
million   comprised   of   an   accrual  of  approximately   $2.1   million   of
anticipated   operating   losses  through   the   date   of   disposal   and   a
reserve    of    $7.9   million   to   fully   reserve   the    Company's    net
investment   in   the   net  assets  of  Automotive   due   to   the   recurring
historical   operating   losses   and  uncertainty   of   realization   of   the
Company's    net    investment    in    the    remaining    net    assets     of
Automotive.    The  remaining  loss  in  1999  in  excess   of   the   loss   in
1998   is   primarily   due   to  reduced  export  sales   and   reduced   sales
to   Automotive's   major   customers  while   it   reduced   inventory   levels
following  a  merger  in  late  1998.   See  discussion  in  Note   4   of   the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Year Ended December 31, 1998 compared to Year Ended December 31,
1997

Revenues

       Total   revenues   of  Businesses  continuing  for   1998   were   $256.5
million   compared   to   $254.1   million  in  1997.   Sales   increased   $3.9
million   and   other   income   decreased  $.8  million.    The   decrease   in
other    income    was    primarily   due   to   certain    valuation    reserve
adjustments     recorded    against    specifically    identified    investments
in 1998.

Net Sales

       Consolidated   net   sales   of   Businesses   continuing   included   in
total   revenues   for   1998   were  $255.9   million,   compared   to   $251.9
million   for   1997,   an  increase  of  $4.0  million.    This   increase   in
sales    resulted   principally   from   increased   sales   in   the    Climate
Control    Business    of   $9.9   million,   primarily   due    to    increased
volume   and   price   increases  in  both  the   heat   pump   and   fan   coil
product   lines.    This   increase   was  offset   by   (i)   decreased   sales
in    the    Industrial   Products   Business   of   $1.3   million    due    to
decreased   sales   of  machine  tools,  and  (ii)  decreased   sales   in   the
Chemical   Business   of   $4.7   million   primarily   due   to   lower   sales
volume   in   the   U.S.   of   agricultural  and  blasting   products.    Sales
were    lower   in   the   Chemical   Business   during   1998,   compared    to
1997,    as    a    result    of    adverse   weather    conditions    in    its
agricultural   markets   during   the  spring   and   fall   planting   seasons.
Blasting   sales   in   the  Chemical  Business  declined   as   a   result   of
elimination of certain low profit margin sales.

Gross Profit

       Gross   profit   of   Businesses  continuing   increased   $5.1   million
and   was   21.3%   of  net  sales  for  1998,  compared   to   19.6%   of   net
sales    for   1997.    The   gross   profit   percentage   improved   in    the
Chemical    and    Industrial   Products   Businesses.    It   was    consistent
from 1997 to 1998 in the Climate Control Business.

        The    increase    in    the   gross   profit   percentage    was    due
primarily   to   (i)   lower   production  costs  in   the   Chemical   Business
due   to   the   effect  of  lower  prices  of  anhydrous   ammonia   in   1998,
(ii)   high   unabsorbed   overhead  costs   in   1997   caused   by   excessive
downtime    related   to   problems   associated   with   mechanical    failures
at    the    Chemical   Business'   primary   manufacturing   plant    in    the
first   half   of   1997,  and  (iii)  higher  gross  profit  product   mix   of
machine tools sold in the Industrial Products Business.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

        Selling,   general   and   administrative   ("SG&A")   expenses   as   a
percent   of   net   sales   from   Businesses   continuing   for   1998    were
19.1%   compared   to  19.4%  for  1997.   This  decrease   is   primarily   the
result   of   increased   sales   in  the  Climate   Control   Business   offset
by    increased    SG&A    expenses   relating   to    additional    information
technology    personnel    to    support    management    information     system
changes   and   higher   variable  costs  due  to  a   change   in   sales   mix
toward   greater   domestic   sales  which  carry   a   higher   SG&A   percent.
This   decrease   is  offset  by  the  decrease  in  sales   of   the   Chemical
Business   with   an   increase   in   SG&A   expenses   relating   to    higher
provisions   for   uncollectible   accounts   receivable   in   1998.   Of   the
net   change   in   SG&A   in   1998  compared  to  1997,   approximately   $1.0
million   is   due   to   legal  fees  in  1997  over   1998   to   assert   the
Company's position in various legal proceedings.

Interest Expense

        Interest   expense   for   continuing   businesses   of   the   Company,
before    deducting   capitalized   interest,   was   $14.5    million    during
1998,   compared   to   $12.5   million  during   1997.    During   1997,   $1.1
million    of   interest   expense   was   capitalized   in   connection    with
construction    of   the   DSN   Plant.    The   increase   of   $2.0    million
before    the    effect    of    capitalization    primarily    resulted    from
increased   borrowings.    The   increased   borrowings   were   necessary    to
support    capital    expenditures,   higher   accounts   receivable    balances
and    to   meet   the   operational   requirements   of   the   Company.    See
"Liquidity    and   Capital   Resources"   of   this   Management's   Discussion
and Analysis.

Businesses Disposed of

       The   Company  sold  certain  real  estate  in  1998  for   a   gain   on
disposal   of   $13.0  million.   See  discussion  in  Note  5  of   the   Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income   (loss)   from   Continuing   Operations   Before   Income   Taxes   and
Extraordinary Charge

        The    Company   had   income   from   continuing   operations    before
income   taxes   and   extraordinary   charge   of   $2.5   million   for   1998
compared    to   a   loss   of   $8.7   million   for   1997.    The   increased
profitability   of   $11.2  million  was  primarily   due   to   the   gain   on
the   sale   of   the   Tower  in  1998,  the  increased   gross   profit,   and
the    decreased    SG&A    offset   by   increased   interest    expense,    as
previously discussed.

Provision for Income Taxes

       As   a   result   of  the  Company's  net  operating  loss   carryforward
for   income   tax  purposes  as  discussed  elsewhere  herein   and   in   Note
9    of    Notes   to   Consolidated   Financial   Statements,   the   Company's
provisions   for   income   taxes   for  1998   and   1997   are   for   current
state income taxes and federal alternative minimum taxes.

Discontinued Operations

       The   Company   had   losses  from  discontinued   operations,   net   of
income   taxes,   of   $4.4  million  for  1998,  compared   to   $9.7   million
for   1997.    The   decrease   in   losses   is   primarily   due   to   higher
production     volumes,     improved     experience     with     returns     and
allowances    and   a   decrease   in   SG&A   expenses   resulting    from    a
comprehensive   cost   reduction  implemented   by   the   Company   offset   by
an     increase     in    interest    expense    resulting    from     increased
borrowings.   See   discussion  in  Note  4  of  the   Notes   to   Consolidated
Financial Statements.


Extraordinary Charge

       In   1997,   in   connection   with  the  issuance   of   the   10   3/4%
unsecured   senior  notes  due  2007  by  a  subsidiary  of   the   Company,   a
subsidiary    of    the    Company    retired    the    outstanding    principal
associated    with   a   certain   financing   arrangement   and   incurred    a
prepayment    fee.    The   prepayment   fee   and   loan   origination    costs
expensed   in   1997   related   to   the   financing   arrangement   aggregated
approximately   $4.6   million.    See   discussion   in   Note   8    of    the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow From Operations

       Historically,   the   Company's  primary  cash  needs   have   been   for
operating     expenses,    working    capital    and    capital    expenditures.
The   Company   has   financed   its   cash   requirements   primarily   through
internally    generated   cash   flow,   borrowings    under    its    revolving
credit    facilities,    the    issuance   of    $105    million    of    Senior
Unsecured   Notes   by   its   wholly   owned   subsidiary,   ClimaChem,   Inc.,
in November 1997, and secured equipment financing.

       Net   cash   used   by   continuing  operations  for   the   year   ended
December   31,   1999   was   $.4  million,  after   $18.1   million   for   net
loss    from    discontinued    operations   of    the    Automotive    Products
Business,   loss   on   the   disposition  of  the  Australian   subsidiary   of
$2.0   million,   inventory   write-down  for   $1.6   million   and   provision
for    losses    on   purchase   commitments   of   $8.4   million    (net    of
amounts   realized   in   cost  of  sales  of  $1.8  million),   provision   for
impairment    on    long-lived   assets   primarily    associated    with    two
chemical     plants    of    $4.1    million,    noncash    depreciation     and
amortization   of   $11.4   million,  net   provision   for   losses   of   $1.5
million     relating     to     accounts    receivable,     inventory,     notes
receivable    and    other    and   including   the   following    changes    in
assets    and    liabilities:     (i)   accounts   receivable    increases    of
$1.4    million;    (ii)   inventory   decreases   of   $3.9   million;    (iii)
increases    in   supplies   and   prepaid   items   of   $.2   million;    (iv)
decrease   in   accounts  payable  of  $1.1  million;  and   (v)   increase   in
accrued    liabilities   of   $2.8   million.    The   increase   in    accounts
receivable    was   primarily   due   to   improved   sales   in   the    fourth
quarter    in    the    Climate   Control   Business   offset    by    declining
fourth    quarter   sales   in   the   Industrial   Products   Business.     The
decrease   in   inventory   was  primarily  due  to   the   reduction   in   the
Chemical   Business'   inventory  partially   offset   by   increases   in   the
Climate   Control   Business  due  to  a  build   up   of   inventory   in   the
plant   due   to   an   increase   in  confirmed  orders   during   the   fourth
quarter.    The   decrease   in   accounts   payable   is   primarily   due   to
decreases    in    liabilities    associated    with    purchases     of     raw
materials   in   the   Chemical   business   partially   offset   by   increases
in    liabilities   associated   with   purchases   of   raw    materials    and
purchased   goods   in   the   Climate   Control   Business   and   timing    of
payments    in   the   Industrial   Products   Business.    The   increase    in
accrued    liabilities    is   primarily   due   to   increases    in    accrued
warranty   and   sales   incentives  in  the  Climate   Control   Business   and
deferred   lease   liability   relating   to   the   Baytown   Plant   in    the
Chemical Business.

Cash Flow From Investing and Financing Activities

       Net   cash   provided  by  investing  activities  for  the   year   ended
December   31,   1999  included  $11.2  million  from  the   proceeds   of   the
sale    of    the   Australian   subsidiary,   certain   railcars   and    other
equipment    net    of    $7.6   million   in   capital    expenditures.     The
capital    expenditures    were   primarily   for    the    benefit    of    the
Chemical   and   Climate   Control  Businesses   to   enhance   production   and
product     delivery     capabilities.     Principal    payments     of     $1.1
million   were   received   on  loans  receivable  and   net   expenditures   of
$.8 million were paid relating to other assets.

        Net    cash    provided   by   financing   activities    included    (i)
payments   on   long-   term  debt  and  other  debt  of  $6.1   million,   (ii)
proceeds   from   long-term   and   other   borrowings,   net   of   origination
fees,   of   $2.9   million,  (iii)  net  increases   in   revolving   debt   of
6.6   million   (iv)   decreases  in  drafts  payable  of   $.3   million,   (v)
dividends   of   $1.7   million,   and  (vi)   treasury   stock   purchases   of
$.2 million.

       During   the   first   six   months  of  1999,   the   Company   declared
and   paid   the   following  aggregate  dividends:   (i)   $12.00   per   share
on   each   of   the   outstanding  shares  of  its  Series  B  12%   Cumulative
Convertible    Preferred    Stock;   (ii)   $1.625    per    share    on    each
outstanding   share   of   its   $3.25   Convertible   Exchangeable   Class    C
Preferred   Stock,   Series   2;   and  (iii)   $10.00   per   share   on   each
outstanding     share    of    its    Convertible    Noncumulative     Preferred
Stock.    In   order   to  conserve  cash,  no  dividends   were   declared   or
paid subsequent to June 30, 1999.

Source of Funds

Continuing Businesses

     The    Company   is   a   diversified   holding   company   and,    as    a
result,   it   is   dependent  on  credit  agreements   and   its   ability   to
obtain   funds   from  its  subsidiaries  in  order  to  pay   its   debts   and
obligations.

     The      Company's     wholly-owned     subsidiary,     ClimaChem,     Inc.
("ClimaChem"),    through    its   subsidiaries,    owns    substantially    all
of     the     Company's    Chemical    and    Climate    Control    Businesses.
ClimaChem   and   its   subsidiaries   are  dependent   on   credit   agreements
with   lenders   and   internally  generated  cash  flow  in   order   to   fund
their operations and pay their debts and obligations.

     As   of   December   31,   1999,   the   Company   and   certain   of   its
subsidiaries,    including    ClimaChem,    are    parties    to    a    working
capital   line   of   credit   evidenced  by  two   separate   loan   agreements
("Agreements")     with     a     lender    ("Lender")     collateralized     by
receivables,   inventories   and  proprietary   rights   of   the   parties   to
the   Agreements.    The   Agreements   have   been   amended   from   time   to
time     since     inception    to    accommodate    changes     in     business
conditions   and   financial   results.    This   working   capital   line    of
credit   is   a   primary   source   of   liquidity   for   the   Company    and
ClimaChem.

     As    of    December    31,    1999,   the    Agreements    provided    for
revolving     credit     facilities    ("Revolver")     for     total     direct
borrowing   up   to   $65   million  with  advances   at   varying   percentages
of    eligible    inventory   and   trade   receivables.    At   December    31,
1999,   the   effective   interest   rate  was   9.0%   and   the   availability
for     additional     borrowings,     based     on     eligible     collateral,
approximated     $12.5     million.     Borrowings    under     the     Revolver
outstanding   at   December   31,  1999,  were  $27.5   million.    The   annual
interest   on   the   outstanding   debt  under   the   Revolver   at   December
31,   1999,   at   the   rates   then   in   effect   would   approximate   $2.5
million.   The   Agreements   also   require   the   payment   of   an    annual
facility   fee   of  0.5%  of  the  unused  Revolver  and  restrict   the   flow
of   funds,   except   under  certain  conditions,  to   subsidiaries   of   the
Company that are not parties to the Agreements.

     The     Agreements,    as    amended,    required    the    Company     and
ClimaChem   to   maintain   certain   financial   ratios   and   contain   other
financial    covenants,    including    tangible    net    worth    requirements
and    capital    expenditure    limitations.    In    1999,    the    Company's
financial   covenants   were  not  required  to  be   met   so   long   as   the
Company    and    its    subsidiaries,    including    ClimaChem,    that    are
parties     to    the    Agreements,    maintained    a    minimum     aggregate
availability    under    the    Revolving    Credit    Facility     of     $15.0
million.    When   the   availability   dropped   below   $15.0   million    for
three   consecutive   business   days,   the   Company   and   ClimaChem    were
required   to   maintain   the  financial  ratios  discussed   above.   Due   to
an   interest   payment   of  $5.6  million  made  by  ClimaChem   on   December
30,    1999,    relating    to    the   outstanding    $105    million    Senior
Unsecured    Notes,    the    availability    dropped    below    the    minimum
aggregate   availability   level  required   on   January   1,   2000.   Because
the    Company   and   ClimaChem   could   not   meet   the   financial   ratios
required    by    the   Agreements,   the   Company   and   ClimaChem    entered
into   a   forbearance   agreement  with  the  Lender   effective   January   1,
2000.     The    forbearance   agreement   waived   the    financial    covenant
requirements for a period of sixty (60) days.

     Prior    to   the   expiration   of   the   forbearance   agreement,    the
Agreements    were   amended,   to   provide   for   total   direct   borrowings
of    $50.0   million   including   the   issuance   of   letters   of   credit.
The   maximum   borrowing   ability   under   the   newly   amended   Agreements
is    the    lesser   of   $50.0   million   or   the   borrowing   availability
calculated   using   advance   rates   and   eligible   collateral   less   $5.0
million.    The   amendment   provides  for  an   increase   in   the   interest
rate   from   the   Lender's   prime  rate   plus   .5%   per   annum   to   the
Lender's   prime   rate   plus   1.5%  per   annum,   or   the   Company's   and
ClimaChem's   LIBOR   interest   rate  option,   increased   to   the   Lender's
LIBOR   rate   plus   3.875%  per  annum,  from  2.875%.   The   term   of   the
Agreements    is    through    December   31,    2000,    and    is    renewable
thereafter   for   successive   thirteen-month   terms   if,   by   October   1,
2000,   the   Company   and   Lender  shall  have   determined   new   financial
covenants   for   the   calendar   year  beginning   in   January   2001.    The
Agreements,    as    amended,   require   the   Company   and    ClimaChem    to
maintain    certain    financial   ratios   and    certain    other    financial
covenants,    including    net    worth    and    interest    coverage     ratio
requirements and capital expenditure limitations.

     As   of   March   31,   2000   the   Company,   exclusive   of   ClimaChem,
and   ClimaChem   have   a  borrowing  availability  under   the   revolver   of
$.2   million,   and   $11.0  million  respectively,   or   $11.2   million   in
the aggregate.

     In   addition   to   the   credit  facilities  discussed   above,   as   of
December     31,     1999,    ClimaChem's    wholly-owned    subsidiary,     DSN
Corporation   ("DSN"),   is   a  party  to  three   loan   agreements   with   a
financial    company   (the   "Financing   Company")   for    three    projects.
At    December   31,   1999,   DSN   had   outstanding   borrowings   of    $8.2
million    under    these   loans.    The   loans   have    monthly    repayment
schedules    of   principal   and   interest   through   maturity    in    2002.
The   interest   rate   on  each  of  the  loans  is  fixed   and   range   from
8.2%   to   8.9%.    Annual  interest,  for  the  three  notes   as   a   whole,
at    December   31,   1999,   at   the   agreed   to   interest   rates   would
approximate   $.7   million.    The   loans   are   secured   by   the   various
DSN    property    and   equipment.    The   loan   agreements    require    the
Company    to   maintain   certain   financial   ratios,   including    tangible
net    worth   requirements.    In   April   2000,   DSN   obtained   a   waiver
from    the    Financing   Company   of   the   financial   covenants    through
April 2001.

     During    January    2000,    a   subsidiary    of    ClimaChem    obtained
financing   up   to   $3.5   million   with   the   City   of   Oklahoma    City
("Lender")   to   finance   the   working  capital   requirements   of   Climate
Control's   new   product   line  of  large  air   handlers.    Currently,   the
financing     agreement    requires    the    Company    to    make     interest
payments   on  a  quarterly  basis  at  the  Lender's  LIBOR  rate   plus   two-
tenths   of   one   percent  (.2%)  per  annum.   After   the   Lender   obtains
financing    through    the   U.S.   Department    of    Housing    and    Urban
Development    ("HUD"),    the    Company   will    be    required    to    make
principal   payments  on  an  annual  basis  over  a  term   of   sixteen   (16)
years    but    based    on   a   twenty   (20)   year   amortization    period.
Interest   payments   will   be  required  on  a  semi-annual   basis   at   the
rate   charged   to   the   Lender  by  HUD  at  the  time   of   the   funding.
The   loan   is   secured   by   a  mortgage  on  the   manufacturing   facility
and a separate unrelated parcel of land.

     ClimaChem   is   restricted  as  to  the  funds  that   it   may   transfer
to   the   Company   under  the  terms  contained  in  an   Indenture   covering
the    $105    million   Senior   Unsecured   Notes   issued    by    ClimaChem.
Under   the   terms   of   the  Indenture,  ClimaChem  cannot   transfer   funds
to   the   Company,   except  for  (i)  the  amount   of   income   taxes   that
they   would   be   required  to  pay  if  they  were  not   consolidated   with
the   Company   (the   "Tax  Sharing  Agreement"),  (ii)  an   amount   not   to
exceed    fifty   percent   (50%)   of   ClimaChem's   cumulative   net   income
from   January   1,  1998  through  the  end  of  the  period  for   which   the
calculation    is   made   for   the   purpose   of   proposing    a    dividend
payment,   and   (iii)   the   amount  of  direct   and   indirect   costs   and
expenses    incurred   by   the   Company   on   behalf   of    ClimaChem    and
ClimaChem's   subsidiaries   pursuant   to   a   certain   services    agreement
and    a   certain   management   agreement   to   which   the   companies   are
parties.    ClimaChem   sustained  a  net  loss   of   $2.6   million   in   the
calendar   year   1998,   and   a   net  loss   of   $19.2   million   for   the
calendar   year   1999.    Accordingly,   no   amounts   were   paid   to    the
Company   by   ClimaChem   under   the  Tax   Sharing   Agreement,   nor   under
the    Management    Agreement   during   1999   and   based   on    ClimaChem's
cumulative   losses   at   December  31,  1999,  and   current   estimates   for
the   results   of   operations  for  the  year   ended   December   31,   2000,
none   are   expected   during   2000.    Due   to   these   limitations,    the
Company    and   its   non-ClimaChem   subsidiaries   have   limited   resources
to satisfy their obligations.

     Due    to   the   Company's   and   ClimaChem's   net   losses   for    the
years   of   1998   and   1999   and  the  limited   borrowing   ability   under
the   Revolver,   the   Company   discontinued   payment   of   cash   dividends
on   its   Common   Stock   for  periods  subsequent   to   January   1,   1999,
until    the    Board    of    Directors   determines   otherwise,    and    the
Company   has   not   paid   the  September  15,   1999,   December   15,   1999
and    March    15,   2000   regular   quarterly   dividend   of   $.8125    (or
$743,438     per    quarter)    on    its    outstanding    $3.25    Convertible
Exchangeable     Class     C    Preferred    Stock    Series     2,     totaling
approximately   $2.2   million.   In  addition,  the   Company   did   not   pay
the    January    1,   2000   regular   annual   dividend    of    $12.00    (or
$240,000)    on    the    Series   B   Preferred.   The   Company    does    not
anticipate   having   funds   available  to   pay   dividends   on   its   stock
for the foreseeable future.

     As   of   December   31,   1999,   the   Company   and   its   subsidiaries
which    are   not   subsidiaries   of   ClimaChem   and   exclusive   of    the
Automotive    Products   Business   had   a   working   capital    deficit    of
approximately   $2.3   million,   total   assets   of   $17.6    million,    and
long-term debt due after one year of approximately $13.5 million.

     In    2000,    the   Company   has   planned   capital   expenditures    of
approximately    $10.0    million,    primarily    in    the    Chemical     and
Climate    Control    Businesses.    These    capital    expenditures    include
approximately    $2.0    million,    which    the    Chemical    Business     is
obligated    to    spend   under   consent   orders   with    the    State    of
Arkansas   related   to   environmental   control   facilities   at    its    El
Dorado    facility,    as   previously   discussed   in   this    report.    The
Company    is    currently    exploring   alternatives    to    finance    these
capital    expenditures.   There   are   no   assurances   that   the    Company
will   be   able   to   arrange   financing  for   its   capital   expenditures
or to make the necessary changes to its Indenture in order to borrow the funds
required to finance certain of these expenditures. Failure   to   be   able  to
make  a  substantial  portion  of  these   capital expenditures,    including
those   related    to    environmental    matters, could have a material
adverse effect on the Company.

     The   Company's   plan   for  2000  calls  for  the  Company   to   improve
its    liquidity   and   operating   results   through   the   liquidation    of
non-core   assets,   realization   of  benefits   from   its   late   1999   and
early   2000   realignment   of   its  overhead  (which   serves   to   minimize
the   cash   flow   requirements   of   the   Company   and   its   subsidiaries
which   are   not   subsidiaries  of  ClimaChem)  and   through   various   debt
and equity alternatives.

     Commencing    in    1997,   the   Company   created   a   long-term    plan
which   focused   around   the   Company's   core   operations,   the   Chemical
and   Climate   Control   Businesses.  This  plan  commenced   with   the   sale
of   the   10 3/4%   Senior  Unsecured  Notes  by  the  Company's   wholly-owned
subsidiary,    ClimaChem,   in   November   1997.   This    financing    allowed
the    core    businesses   to   continue   their   growth   through   expansion
into   new   lines   of  business  directly  related  to  the   Company's   core
operations    (i.e.,    completion   of   the   DSN   plant    which    produces
concentrated    nitric   acid,   execution   of   the   EDNC    Baytown    plant
agreement   with   Bayer   to   supply   industrial   acids,   development   and
expansion   into   market-innovative   climate   control   products   such    as
geothermal   and   high   air   quality   systems   and   large   air   handling
units).

     During     1999,    the    Chemical    Business    sustained    significant
losses,   primarily   as   a  result  of  the  reduction   of   selling   prices
for   its   nitrate-based  products  (in  large  part  due  to  the   flood   of
the    market   with   low-priced   Russian   ammonium   nitrate)   while    the
Company's   cost   of  raw  materials  escalated  under  a   contract   with   a
pricing    mechanism    tied   to   the   price    of    natural    gas    which
increased      dramatically.     During     late     1999,      the      Company
renegotiated      this     supply     contract,     extending      the      cash
requirements    under   its   take-or-pay   provision    to    delay    required
takes   to   2000,   2001   and  2002  and  to  obtain   future   raw   material
requirements   at   spot   market   prices.  The   Company   was   also   active
in   bringing   about   a   favorable   preliminary   determination   from   the
International   Trade   Commission   and   Commerce   Department,   which    has
had    the    current   impact   of   minimizing   the   dumping   of    Russian
ammonium    nitrate   in   the   U.S.   market   (although    there    are    no
assurances     that     the    final    determination    will     affirm     the
preliminary     determination).    This, and other factors has allowed the
Chemical Business to see marginally improved market pricing for its
nitrate-based products in the first three months of 2000 compared to the
comparable period in 1999; however, there are no assurances that this
improvement will continue.   The   Company   also   successfully
commenced   operations   of   its   EDNC  Baytown   plant   which   is   selling
product    to    Bayer    under   a   long-term   supply   contract.

     The   Company's   long-range   plans  also   included   the   addition   of
expertise    related   to   the   Company's   core   businesses   to     enhance
its   leadership   team.   Beginning   in   1998,  the   Company   brought   on
several new members of its   Board   of   Directors   with  expertise   in
certain of  the   Company's Businesses, and    individuals     with extensive
knowledge    in    the    banking    industry    and     financial matters.
These   individuals   have   brought   business   insight   to    the
Company     and     helped    management    to    formulate    the
Company's immediate and long-range plans.

     The   plan   for   2000   calls   for  the  Company   to   dispose   of   a
significant     portion    of    its    non-core    assets.    As     previously
discussed,   on   April   5,   2000,  the  Board  of  Directors   approved   the
disposal    of    the    Automotive   Products    Business.    The    Automotive
Products    Business   has   experienced   a   rapidly   consolidating    market
and   is   not   in   an   industry  which  the  Company   sees   as   able   to
produce   an   adequate   return   on   its   investment.   Additionally,    the
Company    is    presently   evaluating   alternatives   for    realizing    its
net    investment   in   the   Industrial   Products   Business.   The   Company
has   had   discussions   involving  the  possible  sale   of   the   Industrial
Products   Business;   however,   no   definitive   plans   are   currently   in
place   and   any   which   may   arise   will   require   Board   of   Director
approval     prior    to    consummation.    The    Company     is     currently
continuing    the    operations   of   the   Industrial    Products    Business;
however,   the   Company   may   sell  or   dispose   of   the   operations   in
2000.   The   Company's   plan   for  2000  also  calls  for   the   realization
of   the   Company's   investment   in  an   option   to   acquire   an   energy
conservation    company    and   advances   made    to    such    entity    (the
"Optioned   Company").   In   April   2000,   the   Company   received   written
acknowledgment   from   the   President  of  the  Optioned   Company   that   it
had   executed   a   letter  of  intent  to  sell  to   a   third   party,   the
proceeds   from   which   would   allow   repayment   of   the   advances    and
options   payments   to   the   Company   in   the   amount   of   approximately
$2.6     million.     Further,    the    Company    has     received     written
confirmation   from   the   buyer   of   the   Optioned   Company    that    the
transaction   is   on   schedule  to  close  on  April   28,   2000   with   the
amount    due   to   the   Company   related   to   the   advance   and   option
payments   to   be   repaid   in  their  entirety.   Upon   receipt   of   these
proceeds,   the   Company  is  required  to  repay   up   to   $1   million   of
outstanding    indebtedness    to   a   related    party,    SBL    Corporation,
related   to   an   advance  made  to  the  Company  in  1997.   The   remaining
proceeds   would   be   available   for  corporate   purposes.   The   Company's
plan    for    2000    also   identifies   specific   other   non-core    assets
which   the   Company   will   attempt  to   realize   to   provide   additional
working    capital    to   the   Company   in   2000.    See    "Special    Note
Regarding Forward Looking Statements."

     During     1999     and    into    2000,    the    Company     has     been
restructuring    its    operations,    eliminating    businesses    which    are
non-core,    reducing    its    workforce    as    opportunities    arise    and
disposing   of   non-core   assets.  As  discussed  above,   the   Company   has
also    successfully   renegotiated   its   primary   raw   material    purchase
contracts   in   the   Chemical   Business   in   an   effort   to   make   that
Business    profitable    again   and   focused    its    attention    to    the
development    of    new,   market-innovative   products    in    the    Climate
Control   Business.   Although  the  Company  has   not   planned   to   receive
any   dividends,   tax   payments  or  management   fees   from   ClimaChem   in
2000,   it   is   possible  that  ClimaChem  could  pay  up  to   $1.8   million
of    management    fees    to    its   ultimate   parent    should    operating
results   be   favorable (ClimaChem   having   EBITDA   in  excess  of   $26
million   annually,   $6.5 million quarterly, is payable to LSB up to $1.8
million).

     As    previously   mentioned,   the   Company   and   ClimaChem's   primary
credit    facility    terminates   on   December   31,    2000,    unless    the
parties   to   the   agreements   agree   to   new   financial   covenants   for
2001   prior   to   October  1,  2000.  While  there  is   no   assurance   that
the   Company   will   be   successful   in   extending   the   term   of   such
credit    facility,   the   Company   believes   it   has   a    good    working
relationship   with   the   Lender  and  that   it   will   be   successful   in
extending   such   facility   or   replacing   such   facility   from    another
lender with substantially the same terms during 2000.

     In    March    2000,   the   Company   and   ClimaChem   retained    Chanin
Capital   Partners   as   financial  advisors  to  assist in  evaluating
all of the alternatives relating to the Company's and CliamaChem's liquidity,
and to assist the   companies   in determining      their      alternatives
for      restructuring       their capitalization    and    improving
their financial condition.    The  Company    has    also
initiated    discussions   with   third   party   lenders   to    explore    the
possibility     of    obtaining    an    additional    credit    facility     or
expanded   credit   facility   with   which   to   initiate   discussions   with
ClimaChem's   holders   of   the   Senior  Notes,   which,   at   December   31,
1999,   were   trading   at   25%   of   their   face   value.   There   is   no
assurance   that   the   Company   or   ClimaChem   will   be   successful    in
obtaining    the    additional    credit    facility    or    expanded    credit
facility.

     The   Company   has   planned   for  up   to   $10   million   of   capital
expenditures   for   2000,   most   of  which  is   not   presently   committed.
Further,    a    significant    portion    of    this    is    dependent    upon
obtaining    acceptable    financing.   The    Company    expects    to    delay
these    expenditures    as   necessary   based   on   the    availability    of
adequate    working    capital    and    the    availability    of    financing.
Recently,   the   Chemical   Business   has   obtained   relief   from   certain
of   the   compliance   dates   under  its  wastewater   management   project
and   expects   that  this  will  ultimately  result  in  the   delay   in   the
implementation    date    of    such   project. Construction of the wastewater
treatment project is subject to the Company obtaining financing to fund this
project. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to obtain the
required financing. Failure to construct the wastewater treatment facility
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

     The   Company's   plan   for  2000  involves  a   number   of   initiatives
and    assumptions   which   management   believes   to   be   reasonable    and
achievable;   however,   should   the   Company   not   be   able   to   execute
this   plan   described   above,  it  may  not  have  resources   available   to
meet its obligations as they come due.

     During   the   period   from   January   1,   1999,   through   June    30,
1999,   the   Company   purchased  a  total   of   87,267   shares   of   Common
Stock   for   an   aggregate  amount  of  $230,234.    The   Company   has   not
purchased any of its stock since prior to June 30, 1999.

Discontinued Business

     In    May   of   1999,   the   Company's   Automotive   Products   Business
entered   into   a   Loan   and  Security  Agreement   (the   "Automotive   Loan
Agreement")    with    an    unrelated   lender   (the   "Automotive    Lender")
secured    by   substantially   all   assets   of   the   Automotive    Products
Business    to    refinance   the   Automotive   Products   Business'    working
capital    requirements    that    were   previously    financed    under    the
Revolver.     The    Company   was   required   to   provide   the    Automotive
Lender   a   $1.0   million  standby  letter  of  credit   to   further   secure
the    Automotive    Loan    Agreement.    The   Automotive    Loan    Agreement
provides    a    Revolving   Loan   Facility   (the   "Automotive    Revolver"),
Letter   of   Credit   Accommodations  and  a   Term   Loan   (the   "Automotive
Term Loan").

     The     Automotive    Revolver    provides    for    a     total     direct
borrowings   up   to   $16.0  million,  including  the   issuance   of   letters
of    credit.     The   Automotive   Revolver   provides   for    advances    at
varying    percentages   of   eligible   inventory   and   trade    receivables.
The   Automotive   Revolver   provides   for   interest   at   the   rate   from
time   to   time   publicly   announced  by  First  Union   National   Bank   as
its    prime   rate   plus   one   percent   (1%)   per   annum   or,   at   the
Company's   option,   on   the  Automotive  Lender's   LIBOR   rate   plus   two
and    three    quarters   percent   (2.75%)   per   annum.    The    Automotive
Revolver   also   requires   the  payment  of  a  monthly   servicing   fee   of
$3,000   and   a  monthly  unused  line  fee  equal  to  0.5%  of   the   unused
credit    facility.    At   December   31,   1999,   the   effective    interest
rate   was   9.5%   excluding  the  effect  of  the  service  fee   and   unused
line    fee    (10.19%   considering   such   fees).    The    term    of    the
Automotive    Revolver   is   through   May   7,   2001,   and   is    renewable
thereafter    for   successive   twelve   month   terms.    At   December    31,
1999,    outstanding    borrowing   under   the   Automotive    Revolver    were
$8.8   million;   in   addition,   the   Automotive   Products   Business    had
$.4     million,     based    on    eligible    collateral,    available     for
additional   borrowing   under   the   Automotive   Revolver.    As   a   result
of   the   Company's   decision   to  sell   or   otherwise   dispose   of   the
operations     of     the    Automotive    Products    Business,     outstanding
borrowings   at   December   31,  1999,  are   included   in   net   assets   of
discontinued    operations   (see   Note   4   of    Notes    to    Consolidated
Financial Statements).

     The    Automotive   Loan   Agreement   restricts   the   flow   of   funds,
except    under   certain   conditions,   between   the   Automotive    Products
Business and the Company and its subsidiaries.

     The   Automotive   Term   Loan   is  evidenced   by   a   term   promissory
note   (the   "Term  Promissory  Note")  and  is  secured  by   all   the   same
collateral   as   the   Automotive  Revolver.   The   interest   rate   of   the
Automotive    Term    Loan   is   the   same   as   the   Automotive    Revolver
discussed   above.    The   terms   of  the   Term   Promissory   Note   require
sixty    (60)   consecutive   monthly   principal   installments   (or   earlier
as    provided   in   the   Term   Promissory   Note)   of   which   the   first
thirty-six    (36)   installments   shall   each   be   in   the    amount    of
$48,611,   the   next   twenty-two   (22)  installments   shall   each   be   in
the   amount   of   $33,333,  and  the  last  installment  shall   be   in   the
amount   of   the   entire   unpaid  principal   balance.    Interest   payments
are    also    required    monthly   as   calculated    on    the    outstanding
principal     balance.     At    December    31,    1999,    the     outstanding
borrowings   under   the   Automotive  Term   Loan   were   approximately   $2.2
million   and   are   included   in  net  assets  of   discontinued   operations
(see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

     The    annual    interest    on   the   outstanding    debt    under    the
Automotive    Revolver   and   Automotive   Term   Loan    at    December    31,
1999, at the rates then in effect would approximate $1.1 million.

     On   April   5,  2000,  the  Board  of  Directors  approved   a   plan   of
disposal      of     the     Company's     Automotive     Products      Business
("Automotive").    The   plan   is  to  sell  the   assets   for   book   value.
At   closing,   the   Company   is  to  receive   notes   receivable   for   its
net    investment    expected   to   approximate   $8.0   million,    and    the
buyer   is   to   assume   substantially  all   of   the   Automotive   Products
Business'    liabilities    which,   prior   to    the    Zeller    acquisition,
were   approximately   $22.2   million   as   of   December   31,   1999.
These notes will be secured by a second lien on substantially all of the assets
of the buyer but payment of principal and interest will be subordinated to the
buyer's primary lender.  The losses    associated    with    the
discontinuation    of    this    business segment     are    reflected    in
the    net    loss    from    discontinued operations on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.

     The   closing   of   the   sale   of  Automotive   Products   Business   is
subject    to    satisfaction    of    certain    conditions.     The    Company
expects   to   close   the  sale  of  Automotive  by   June   30,   2000.    The
preliminary   terms   of   the  pending  sale  of  Automotive   calls   for   no
payments   of   principal   on   the  approximately   $8.0   million   note   to
the    Company    for    the    first   two   years   following    the    close.
Interest   will   accrue  at  Wall  Street  Journal  Prime  +  1.0%   but   will
not    be   paid   until   and   if   Automotive's   availability   reaches    a
level of $1.0 million.

     The    Company    will   remain   a   guarantor   on   certain    equipment
notes    of    Automotive,    which    had    outstanding    indebtedness     of
approximately   $4.5   million   as   of   March   31,   2000,   and   on    the
Automotive   Revolver   in   the  amount  of  $1.0   million   for   which   the
Company has posted a letter of credit at December 31, 1999.

       In   an   effort   to   assist  the  Automotive  Products   Business   to
be   in   a   position  to  complete  the  sell  described   above,   on   March
9,   2000,   the   Company  closed  the  acquisition  of   certain   assets   of
the    Zeller   Corporation   representing   its   universal   joint   business.
In     connection    with    the    acquisition    of    these    assets,    the
Automotive      Products     Business     assumed      an      aggregate      of
approximately    $7.5    million   (unaudited)    in    Zeller's    liabilities,
$4.7    million    of   which   was   funded   by   the   Automotive    Products
Business   primary   lender.    (The  balance   of   the   assumed   liabilities
is   expected   to   be  funded  out  of  working  capital  of  the   Automotive
Products    Business).     For   year   ended    December    31,    1999,    the
universal    joint    business    of   Zeller    had    unaudited    sales    of
approximately $11.7 and a net loss of $1.5 million.

Foreign Subsidiary

       As   previously   discussed  in  this  report,  in  August,   1999,   the
Company   sold   substantially  all  of  the  assets   of   its   wholly   owned
Australian    subsidiary,   effectively   disposing   of   this    portion    of
the    Chemical    Business.   All   of   the   proceeds   received    by    the
Company    have    been    applied    to    reduce    the    indebtedness     of
ClimaChem,    or    have    been   reinvested   in   related    businesses    of
ClimaChem    in   accordance   with   the   Indenture   of   Senior    Unsecured
Notes.

Joint Ventures and Options to Purchase

        Prior   to   1997,   the   Company,   through   a   subsidiary,   loaned
$2.8    million   to   a   French   manufacturer   of   HVAC   equipment   whose
product    line   is   compatible   with   that   of   the   Company's   Climate
Control    Business   in   the   USA.    Under   the   loan    agreement,    the
Company   has   the   option,  which  expires  June  15,   2005,   to   exchange
its   rights   under   the   loan  for  100%  of  the   borrower's   outstanding
common   stock.    The   Company   obtained   a   security   interest   in   the
stock   of   the   French   manufacturer  to  secure   its   loan.    Subsequent
to   1996,   the   Company   advanced  an  additional   $.9   million   to   the
French    manufacturer   bringing   the   total   of   the    loan    to    $3.7
million.    The   $3.7   million   loan,   less   a   $1.5   million   valuation
reserve   for   losses   incurred   by  the   French   manufacturer   prior   to
1997,   is   carried   on   the   books  as   a   note   receivable   in   other
assets.    As  of  the  date  of  this  report,  the  decision  has   not   been
made   to   exercise   its  option  to  acquire  the   stock   of   the   French
manufacturer.

       In   1995,   a   subsidiary   of  the  Company   invested   approximately
$2.8   million   to   purchase  a  fifty  percent  (50%)  equity   interest   in
an     energy    conservation    joint    venture    (the    "Project").     The
Project    had    been    awarded   a   contract   to    retrofit    residential
housing   units   at   a  US  Army  base,  which  it  completed   during   1996.
The    completed    contract   was   for   installation   of    energy-efficient
equipment     (including    air    conditioning    and    heating     equipment)
which   would   reduce   utility  consumption.    For   the   installation   and
management,   the   Project  will  receive  a  percent   of   all   energy   and
maintenance    savings   during   the   twenty   (20)   year   contract    term.
The    Project    spent   approximately   $17.9   million   to   retrofit    the
residential    housing   units   at   the   US   Army   base.     The    project
received    a   loan   from   a   lender   to   finance   approximately    $14.0
million    of    the    cost   of   the   Project.    The   Company    is    not
guaranteeing   any   of   the  lending  obligations   of   the   Project.    The
Company's   equity   interest  in  the  results  of  the   operations   of   the
Project   were   not   material   for   the   years   ended   December,    1999,
1998 and 1997.

       During   1995,   the   Company  executed   a   stock   option   agreement
to   acquire   eighty  percent  (80%)  of  the  stock  of  a   specialty   sales
organization   ("Optioned   Company"),   which   owns   the   remaining    fifty
percent   (50%)   equity   interest  in  the   Project   discussed   above,   to
enhance   the   marketing   of   the  Company's   air   conditioning   products.
The    Company   has   decided   not   to   exercise   the   Option   and    has
allowed    the    term   of   the   Option   to   lapse.    See    "Management's
Discussion    and   Analysis   of   Financial   Condition   and    Results    of
Operations-Source    of    Funds"   for   discussion    of    sale    of    this
investment   in   2000.    Through  the  date  of  this  report,   the   Company
has    made   option   payments   aggregating   $1.3   million   ($1.0   million
of    which   is   refundable)   and   has   advanced   the   Optioned   Company
approximately     $1.7    million    including    accrued     interest.      The
Company   has   recorded   reserves  of  $1.5   million   against   the   loans,
accrued     interest    and    option    payments.     The    loans,     accrued
interest   and   option   payments  are  secured  by   the   stock   and   other
collateral of the Optioned Company.

Debt and Performance Guarantee

        At    December    31,   1998,   the   Company    and    one    of    its
subsidiaries    had    outstanding    guarantees    of    approximately     $2.6
million   of   indebtedness   of  a  startup  aviation   company   in   exchange
for     an     ownership    interest    in    the    aviation     company     of
approximately 45%.

       During   the   first   quarter   of  1999,   the   Company   was   called
upon     to     perform    on    its    guarantees.     The     Company     paid
approximately   $500,000   to   a  lender  and   assumed   an   obligation   for
a   $2.0   million   note,   which   is   due   in   equal   monthly   principal
payments,   plus   interest,   through  August,   2004,   in   satisfaction   of
the   guarantees.    In  connection  with  the  demand   on   the   Company   to
perform   under   its   guarantee,  the  Company  and   the   other   guarantors
formed   a   new   company   ("KAC")  which   acquired   the   assets   of   the
aviation company through foreclosure.

       The   Company   and  the  other  shareholders  of  KAC   are   attempting
to   sell   the   assets   acquired  in  foreclosure.   Proceeds   received   by
the    Company,   if   any,   from   the   sale   of   KAC   assets   will    be
recognized in the results of operations when and if realized.

       As   of   December   31,   1999,   LSB  has   agreed   to   guarantee   a
performance    bond    of    $2.1    million    of    a    start-up    operation
providing services to the Company's Climate Control Business.

Availability of Company's Loss Carry-Overs

       The   Company's  cash  flow  in  future  years  may  benefit   from   its
ability   to   use   net   operating  loss  ("NOL")   carry-overs   from   prior
periods   to   reduce   the  federal  income  tax  payments   which   it   would
otherwise   be   required  to  make  with  respect  to   income   generated   in
such   future   years.    Such   benefit,  if   any,   is   dependent   on   the
Company's   ability   to   generate   taxable   income   in   future    periods,
for   which   there   is  no  assurance.   Such  benefit,  if   any,   will   be
limited   by   the   Company's   reduced  NOL  for   alternative   minimum   tax
purposes,    which   was   approximately   $40   million   at    December    31,
1999.    As   of   December  31,  1999,  the  Company  had   available   regular
tax    NOL   carry-overs   of   approximately   $75   million   based   on   its
federal    income   tax   returns   as   filed   with   the   Internal   Revenue
Service    for    taxable   years   through   1998.    These   NOL   carry-overs
will    expire   beginning   in   the   year   2000.    Due   to   its    recent
history   of   reporting   net   losses,   the   Company   has   established   a
valuation   allowance   on   a  portion  of  its   NOLs   and   thus   has   not
recognized    the    full   benefit   of   its   NOLs   in   the    accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

       The   amount   of   these   carry-overs   has   not   been   audited   or
approved    by    the   Internal   Revenue   Service   and,   accordingly,    no
assurance   can   be   given  that  such  carry-overs  will   not   be   reduced
as   a   result  of  audits  in  the  future.   In  addition,  the  ability   of
the   Company   to   utilize  these  carry-overs   in   the   future   will   be
subject    to    a    variety   of   limitations   applicable    to    corporate
taxpayers   generally   under  both  the  Internal   Revenue   Code   of   1986,
as    amended,    and   the   Treasury   Regulations.    These    include,    in
particular,    limitations   imposed   by   Code    Section    382    and    the
consolidated return regulations.

Impact of Year 2000

        In    1999,    the   Company   completed   its   project   to    enhance
certain   of   its   Information   Technology   ("IT")   systems   and   certain
other    technologically    advanced   communication    systems.     Over    the
life    of   the   project,   the   Company   capitalized   approximately   $1.3
million    in    costs   to   accomplish   its   enhancement    program.     The
capitalized    costs    included   $.4   million   in    external    programming
costs,    with    the    remainder   representing    hardware    and    software
purchases.    The   time   and  expense  of  the  project   did   not   have   a
material    impact    on   the   Company's   financial    condition.     As    a
result    of   these   modifications,   the   Company   did   not   incur    any
significant   problems   relating   to  Year   2000   issues.   There   was   no
interruption    of    business    with   key   suppliers    or    downturn    in
economic   activity   caused   by  problems   with   Year   2000   issues.    As
of   the   date   of  this  report,  the  Company  has  not  been  notified   of
any   warranty   issues  relating  to  Year  2000  for  the  products   it   has
sold    and    therefore,   the   Company   believes   it   should    have    no
material   exposure   to  contingencies  related  to   the   Year   2000   issue
for   the   products   it   has   sold.    The   Company   will   continue    to
monitor   its   computer   applications  and  those   of   its   suppliers   and
vendors   throughout   the   year  2000  to  ensure   that   any   latent   Year
2000 matters that may arise are addressed promptly.

Contingencies

The   Company   has   several   contingencies  that   could   impact   its   liq
uidity   in   the   event  that  the  Company  is  unsuccessful   in   defending
against    the    claimants.   Although   management   does    not    anticipate
that   these   claims   will   result   in  substantial   adverse   impacts   on
its   liquidity,   it   is  not  possible  to  determine   the   outcome.    The
preceding   sentence   is   a  forward  looking  statement   that   involves   a
number   of   risks   and   uncertainties  that  could  cause   actual   results
to     differ    materially,    such    as,    among    other    factors,    the
following:    a   court   finds   the   Chemical   Business   liable    for    a
material    amount    of   damages   in   the   antitrust    lawsuits    pending
against     the    Chemical    Business    in    a    manner    not    presently
anticipated    by   the   Company.    See   "Business",   "Legal    Proceedings"
and Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
          RISK

General

       The   Company's   results  of  operations  and   operating   cash   flows
are   impacted   by   changes  in  market  interest  rates  and   raw   material
prices    for    products   used   in   its   manufacturing   processes.     All
information is presented in U.S. dollars.

Interest Rate Risk

       The   Company's   interest   rate  risk   exposure   results   from   its
debt    portfolio   which   is   impacted   by   short-term   rates,   primarily
prime    rate-based   borrowings   from   commercial   banks,   and    long-term
rates,     primarily    fixed-rate    notes,    some    of    which     prohibit
prepayment or require substantial prepayment penalties.

       The   Company   is  also  a  party  to  a  series  of  agreements   under
which    it   is   leasing   a   nitric   acid   plant.   The   minimum    lease
payments   associated   therewith,   prior   to   execution   in   June    1999,
were    directly    impacted   by   the   change   in   interest    rates.    To
mitigate   a   portion   of   the   Company's   exposure   to   adverse   market
changes    related   to   this   leveraged   lease,   in   1997   the    Company
entered    into    a    interest   rate   forward    agreement    whereby    the
Company   was   the   fixed   rate   payor  on  notional   amounts   aggregating
$25   million,   net   to  its  50%  interest,  with  a  weighted   average   of
7.12%.   The   Company   accounted  for  this   forward   under   the   deferral
method,   so   long   as   high   correlation  was   maintained,   whereby   the
net   gain   or   loss   upon  settlement  adjusts  the   item   being   hedged,
the   minimum   lease   rentals,   in  periods   commencing   with   the   lease
execution.    As   of   December   31,   1999,   the   Company   has    deferred
costs     of     approximately    $2.7    million    associated    with     such
agreement,   which   is   being  amortized  over  the  initial   term   of   the
lease.     The    following    table    provides    information    about     the
Company's    interest    rate   sensitive   financial    instruments    as    of
December 31, 1999.



                            Years Ending December 31,

                        2000       2001        2002        2003       2004      Thereafter  Total



- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       
Expected maturities of long-term debt:


  Variable rate debt  $27,639     $2,561      $  121      $  133    $  145       $   922    $31,521

    Weighted average
     interest rate (1)  9.00%     10.40%       9.00%       9.00%      9.00%        9.00%      9.00%

  Fixed rate debt     $ 5,720     $7,967      $1,637      $2,774     $1,460     $106,993   $126,551

    Weighted average
     interest rate (2) 10.52%     10.64%      10.65%      10.68%     10.70%       10.73%     10.66%

___________________

(1)Interest  rate  is  based on the aggregate rate of  debt  outstanding  as  of
  December  31,  1999. Interest is at floating rate based on the lender's  prime
  rate  plus .5% per annum, or at the Company's option, on its Revolving  Credit
  Agreements on the lender's LIBOR rate plus 2.875% per annum. During the  first
  quarter  of 2000, the Revolving Credit Agreements were amended which  included
  an  increase in the floating rate based on the Lender's prime rate  plus  1.5%
  per  annum, or at the Company's option, on the Lender's LIBOR rate plus 3.875%
  per  annum.  The effect of this change in interest rate based on the  Lender's
  prime rate at December 31, 1999, increased the weighted average interest  rate
  to 9.95% for 2000 and the total weighted average interest rate to 9.81%.

(2)Interest rate is based on the aggregate rate of debt outstanding as of
   December 31, 1999.





                         December 31, 1999     December 31, 1998
                     Estimated   Carrying    Estimate  Carrying
                      Fair        Fair        Fair      Fair
                      Value       Value       Value     Value
                                    (in thousands)

Variable Rate:
  Bank debt and
   equipment
   financing         $ 31,521    $ 31,521   $ 26,196   $ 26,196

Fixed Rate:
  Bank debt and
   equipment
   financing           21,269      21,551     19,590     19,310

 Subordinated notes    26,250     105,000    105,000    105,000
                    _____________________________________________
                     $ 79,040    $158,072   $150,786   $150,506


The fair value of the Company's Senior Notes was determined based
on a market quotation for such securities.

Raw Material Price Risk

      The  Company  has a commitment to purchase 96,000  tons  of
anhydrous ammonia under a contract.  The Company's purchase price
can be higher or lower than the current market spot price.  Based
on  the  forward  contract  pricing  existing  during  1999,  and
estimated market prices for products to be manufactured and  sold
during   the   remainder  of  the  contract,   the   accompanying
Consolidated  Financial Statements included a loss  provision  of
approximately $8.4 million for anhydrous ammonia required  to  be
purchased during the remainder of the contract.

Foreign Currency Risk

      During  1999, the Company sold its wholly owned  subsidiary
located  in Australia, for which the functional currency was  the
local  currency,  the  Australian dollar.  Since  the  Australian
subsidiary  accounts  were  converted  into  U.S.  dollars   upon
consolidation  with  the  Company,  declines  in  value  of   the
Australian dollar to the U.S. dollar resulted in translation loss
to  the  Company.   As  a result of the sale  of  the  Australian
subsidiary,  which was closed on August 2, 1999,  the  cumulative
foreign  currency translation loss of approximately $1.1  million
has  been  included  in the loss on disposal  of  the  Australian
subsidiary at December 31, 1999.

Item 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

      The  Company  has  included the  financial  statements  and
supplementary  financial  information  required  by   this   item
immediately  following  Part  IV  of  this  report   and   hereby
incorporates  by  reference  the  relevant  portions   of   those
statements and information into this Item 8.





Item 9.   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

      No  disagreements between the Company and  its  accountants
have occurred within the 24-month period prior to the date of the
Company's most recent financial statements.

                     SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING
                   FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


      Certain  statements contained within  this  report  may  be
deemed "Forward-Looking Statements" within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of
the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  All statements
in  this  report  other than statements of  historical  fact  are
Forward-Looking Statements that are subject to known and  unknown
risks,  uncertainties and other factors which could cause  actual
results and performance of the Company to differ materially  from
such  statements.   The words "believe", "expect",  "anticipate",
"intend",  "will",  and  similar  expressions  identify  Forward-
Looking Statements.  Forward-Looking Statements contained  herein
relate  to, among other things, (i) ability to improve operations
and  become profitable, (ii) establishing a position as a  market
leader,  (iii)  the  amount of the loss provision  for  anhydrous
ammonia  required  to be purchased in that the  cost  to  produce
Chemical  Business products will improve, (iv)  declines  in  the
price  of anhydrous ammonia,  (v) obtaining a final ruling as  to
Russian  dumping  of anhydrous ammonia (vi) availability  of  net
operating  loss carryovers, (vii) amount to be spent relating  to
compliance  with federal, state and local environmental  laws  at
the  El  Dorado Facility, (viii) liquidity and availability of
funds, (ix) profits through  liquidation of assets or realignment
of assets  or  some other method, (x) anticipated financial
performance, (xi) ability to  comply  with  general
working capital  and  debt service  requirements, (xii) ability to
be  able  to  continue  to borrow  under  the  Company's revolving
line  of  credit,  (xiii) ability to complete the sale of the
Automotive Products Business, (xiv)  adequate  cash  flows to meet
its  presently  anticipated capital requirements, (xv) ability
of the EDNC Baytown Plant to generate  approximately $35 million
in annual gross revenues,  or (xvi)  ability to make required
capital improvements, and (xvii) ability to carry out its plans for
2000.  While  the Company  believes  the expectations reflected
in  such  Forward-Looking Statements are reasonable, it can give
no assurance  such expectations  will  prove  to have been  correct.
There  are  a variety  of factors which could cause future outcomes
to  differ materially  from those described in this report,  including,
but not  limited to, (i) decline in general economic conditions, both
domestic and foreign, (ii) material reduction in revenues,  (iii)
material increase in interest rates; (iv) inability to collect in
a  timely  manner a material amount of receivables, (v) increased
competitive pressures, (vi) changes in federal, state  and  local
laws and regulations, especially environmental regulations, or in
interpretation   of  such,  pending  (vii)  additional   releases
(particularly   air  emissions  into  the  environment),   (viii)
material increases in equipment, maintenance, operating or  labor
costs  not  presently  anticipated  by  the  Company,  (ix)   the
requirement  to use internally generated funds for  purposes  not
presently  anticipated, (x) ability to become profitable,  or  if
unable  to  become profitable, the inability to secure additional
liquidity in the form of additional equity or debt, (xi) the cost
for  the  purchase of anhydrous ammonia decreasing, (xii) changes
in competition, (xii) the loss of any significant customer, (xiv)
changes   in  operating  strategy  or  development  plans,   (xv)
inability  to  fund  the working capital  and  expansion  of  the
Company's  businesses,  (xvi)  adverse  results  in  any  of  the
Company's   pending  litigation,  (xvii)  inability   to   obtain
necessary raw materials, (xviii) ability to recover the Company's
investment  in  the  aviation company, (x) Bayer's  inability  or
refusal  to purchase all of the Company's production at  the  new
Baytown  nitric  acid plant; (xx)  continuing  decreases  in  the
selling  price  for  the Chemical Business'  nitrogen  based  end
products,  (xxi)  inability  to  negotiate  amendments   to   the
Indenture (xxii) inability to complete the sale of the Automotive
Products   Business, (xxiii) sale of the Optioned Company not completed
or, if completed, not consummated on terms that the Company has been
advised of, and  (xxiv)  other  factors  described   in
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  and
Results  of  Operation" contained in this  report.   Given  these
uncertainties,  all  parties are cautioned  not  to  place  undue
reliance   on   such  Forward-Looking  Statements.  The   Company
disclaims  any  obligation  to update  any  such  factors  or  to
publicly  announce  the result of any revisions  to  any  of  the
Forward-Looking  Statements contained herein  to  reflect  future
events or developments.

                            PART III

     The Company hereby incorporates by reference the information
required by Part III of this report except for the information on
the Company's executive officers included under Part 4A of Part I
of  this  report, from the definitive proxy statement  which  the
Company   intends  to  file  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on or before April  29, 2000, in connection  with  the
Company's 2000 annual meeting of stockholders.


                             PART IV

Item 14.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K

(a)(1)    Financial Statements

          The following consolidated financial statements of the
Company appear immediately following this Part IV:

                                                        Pages


Report of Independent Auditors                          F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1999
  and 1998                                              F-2 to F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of
  the three years in the period ended December 31,
  1999                                                  F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
  for each of the three years in the period ended
  December 31, 1999                                     F-5 to F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
  each of the three years in the period
  ended December 31, 1999                               F-7 to F-8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              F-9 to F-52

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)                    F-53 to F 54

(a)(2)    Financial Statement Schedule

          The Company has included the following schedule in this
          report:

II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts                  F-55

     The Company has omitted all other schedules because the
conditions requiring their filing do not exist or because the
required information appears in the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements, including the notes to those statements.

 (a)(3)   Exhibits

          2.1.  Stock Purchase Agreement and Stock Pledge
     Agreement between Dr. Hauri AG, a Swiss Corporation, and LSB
     Chemical Corp., which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 2.2 to the Company's Form 10-K for
     fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.

          3.1.  Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the
     Certificate of Designation dated February 17, 1989, and
     certificate of Elimination dated April 30, 1993, which the
     Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to
     the Company's Registration Statement, No. 33-61640;
     Certificate of Designation for the Company's $3.25
     Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2,
     which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 4.6 to the Company's Registration Statement, No. 33-
     61640.

          3.2.  Bylaws, as amended, which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 3(ii) to the
     Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998.

          4.1.  Specimen Certificate for the Company's Non-
     cumulative Preferred Stock, having a par value of $100 per
     share, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference
     from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter
     ended June 30, 1983.

          4.2.  Specimen Certificate for the Company's Series B
     Preferred Stock, having a par value of $100 per share, which
     the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit
     4.27 to the Company's Registration Statement No. 33-9848.

          4.3.  Specimen Certificate for the Company's Series 2
     Preferred, which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Registration
     Statement No. 33-61640.

          4.4.  Specimen Certificate for the Company's Common
     Stock, which the Company incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Registration Statement No. 33-
     61640.

          4.5.  Renewed Rights Agreement, dated January 6, 1999,
     between the Company and Bank One, N.A., which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit No. 1 to the
     Company's Form 8-A Registration Statement, dated January 27,
     1999.

          4.6. Indenture, dated as of November 26, 1997, by and
     among ClimaChem, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors and Bank
     One, NA, as trustee, which the Company hereby incorporates
     by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to  the Company's Form 8-K,
     dated November 26, 1997.

          4.7. Form 10 3/4% Series B Senior Notes due 2007 which
     the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit
     4.3 to the ClimaChem Registration Statement, No. 333-44905.

          4.8. Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement,
     dated November 21, 1997, by and between BankAmerica Business
     Credit, Inc., and Climate Master, Inc., International
     Environmental Corporation, El Dorado Chemical Company and
     Slurry Explosive Corporation which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the
     ClimaChem Form S-4 Registration Statement, No. 333-44905.

          4.9. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and
     Security Agreement, dated March 12, 1998, between
     BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., and Climate Master, Inc.,
     International Environmental Corporation, El Dorado Chemical
     Company and Slurry Explosive Corporation which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.53 to the
     ClimaChem Form S-4 Registration Statement, No. 333-44905.

          4.11. Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and
     Security Agreement, dated August 14, 1998, between
     BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., and Climate Master, Inc.,
     International Environmental Corporation, El Dorado Chemical
     Company and Slurry Explosive Corporation, which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the
     Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998.

          4.12. Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and
     Security Agreement, dated November 19, 1998, between
     BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., and Climate Master, Inc.,
     International Environmental Corporation, El Dorado Chemical
     Company and Slurry Explosive Corporation, which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the
     Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
     1998.

          4.13. Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and
     Security Agreement, dated April 8, 1999, between BankAmerica
     Business Credit, Inc., and Climate Master, Inc.,
     International Environmental Corporation, El Dorado Chemical
     Company and Slurry Explosive Corporation, which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.16 to the
     Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

          4.14. First Supplemental Indenture, dated February 8,
     1999, by and among ClimaChem, Inc., the Guarantors, and Bank
     One N.A., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference
     from Exhibit 4.19 to the Company's Form 10-K for the year
     ended December 31, 1998.

          4.15. Loan and Security Agreement, dated May 7, 1999,
     by and between Congress Financial Corporation and L&S
     Automotive Products Co., International Bearings, Inc., L&S
     Bearing Co., LSB Extrusion Co., Rotex Corporation, and
     Tribonetics Corporation, which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's
     Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1999.

          4.16. Termination and Mutual General Release Agreement,
     dated as of May 10, 1999, by and among L&S Bearing Co., L&S
     Automotive Products Co., LSB Extrusion Co., Rotex
     Corporation, Tribonetics Corporation, International
     Bearings, Inc., and Bank of America National Trust and
     Savings Association (successor-in-interest to BankAmerica
     Business Credit, Inc.), which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's
     Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1999.

          4.17. Letter Agreement, dated April 30, 1999, by and
     among Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association
     (successor-in-trust to BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc.),
     L&S Bearing Co., LSB Extrusion Co., Tribonetics Corporation,
     Rotex Corporation, L&S Automotive Products Co.,
     International Bearings, Inc., and Congress Financial
     Corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q for
     the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1999.

          4.18. Sixth Amendment, dated May 10, 1999, to Amended
     and Restated Loan and Security Agreement between BankAmerica
     Business Credit, Inc., and Climate Master, Inc.,
     International Environmental Corporation, El Dorado Chemical
     Company and Slurry Explosive Corporation, which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the
     Company's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
     1999.

          4.19. Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security
     Agreement dated May 10, 1999, by and between Bank of America
     National Trust and Savings Association and LSB Industries,
     Inc., Summit Machine Tool Manufacturing Corp., and Morey
     Machinery Manufacturing Corporation, which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the
     Company's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
     1999.

          4.20  First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement,
     dated November 15, 1999 by and between Congress Financial
     Corporation and L&S Automotive Products Co., Industrial
     Bearings, Inc., L&S Bearing Co., LSB Extrusion Co., Rotex
     Corporation, and Tribonetics Corporation.

          4.21  Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement,
     dated March 7, 2000 by and between Congress Financial
     Corporation and L&S Automotive Products Co., International
     Bearings, Inc., L&S Bearing Co., LSB Extrusion Co., Rotex
     Corporation, and Tribonetics Corporation.

          10.1. Form of Death Benefit Plan Agreement between the
     Company
     and the employees covered under the plan, which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10(c)(1) to
     the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
     1980.

          10.2. The Company's 1981 Incentive Stock Option Plan,
     as amended, and 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan, which the
     Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibits 10.1
     and 10.2 to the Company's Registration Statement No. 33-
     8302.

          10.3. Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between
     the Company and employees as to the Company's 1981 Incentive
     Stock Option Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Form 10-K for
     the fiscal year ended December 31, 1984.

          10.4. Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between
     the Company and employees as to the Company's 1986 Incentive
     Stock Option Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Registration
     Statement No. 33-9848.

          10.5. The 1987 Amendments to the Company's 1981
     Incentive Stock Option Plan and 1986 Incentive Stock Option
     Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference
     from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal
     year ended December 31, 1986.

          10.6. The Company's 1993 Stock Option and Incentive
     Plan which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year
     ended December 31, 1993.

          10.7. The Company's 1993 Non-employee Director Stock
     Option Plan which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 10-K for
     the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.

          10.8. Lease Agreement, dated March 26, 1982, between
     Mac Venture, Ltd. and Hercules Energy Mfg. Corporation,
     which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 10.32 to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year
     ended December 31, 1981.

          10.9. Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of May 4,
     1995, between the general partner, and LSB Holdings, Inc.,
     an Oklahoma Corporation, as limited partner which the
     Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.11
     to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 1995.

          10.10.    Lease Agreement dated November 12, 1987,
     between Climate Master, Inc. and West Point Company and
     amendments thereto, which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibits 10.32, 10.36, and 10.37, to the
     Company's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1988.

          10.11.    Severance Agreement, dated January 17, 1989,
     between the Company and Jack E. Golsen, which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.48 to the
     Company's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1988.
     The Company also entered into identical agreements with Tony
     M. Shelby, David R. Goss, Barry H. Golsen, David M. Shear,
     and Jim D. Jones and the Company will provide copies thereof
     to the Commission upon request.

          10.12.    Third Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated as
     of December 31, 1987, between Mac Venture, Ltd. and Hercules
     Energy Mfg. Corporation, which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.49 to the
     Company's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1988.

          10.13.    Employment Agreement and Amendment to
     Severance Agreement dated January 12, 1989 between the
     Company and Jack E. Golsen, dated March 21, 1996 which the
     Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.15
     to the Company's Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December
     31, 1995.

          10.14.    Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated
     June 1, 1992, between the Company and Robert C. Brown, M.D.
     which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's Form 10-K for fiscal year
     ended December 31, 1992.  The Company entered into
     substantially identical agreements with Bernard G. Ille,
     Jerome D. Shaffer and C.L.Thurman, and the Company will
     provide copies thereof to the Commission upon request.

          10.15.    Loan and Security Agreement (DSN Plant) dated
     October 31, 1994 between DSN Corporation and The CIT Group
     which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the fiscal
     quarter ended September 30, 1994.

          10.16.    Loan and Security Agreement (Mixed Acid
     Plant) dated April 5, 1995 between DSN Corporation and The
     CIT Group, which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Form 10-K for
     the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.

          10.17.    First Amendment to Loan and Security
     Agreement (DSN Plant), dated June 1, 1995, between DSN
     Corporation and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.
     which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 10.13 to the ClimaChem Form S-4 Registration
     Statement, No. 333-44905.

          10.18.    First Amendment to Loan and Security
     Agreement (Mixed Acid Plant), dated November 15, 1995,
     between DSN Corporation and The CIT Group/Equipment
     Financing, Inc. which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 10.15 to the ClimaChem Form S-4
     Registration Statement, No. 333-44905.

          10.19.    Loan and Security Agreement (Rail Tank Cars),
     dated November 15, 1995, between DSN Corporation and The CIT
     Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.16 to the
     ClimaChem Form S-4 Registration Statement, No. 333-44905.

          10.20.    First Amendment to Loan and Security
     Agreement (Rail Tank Cars), dated November 15, 1995, between
     DSN Corporation and The CIT
     Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.17 to the
     ClimaChem Form S-4 Registration Statement, No. 333-44905.

          10.22.    Letter Amendment, dated May 14, 1997, to Loan
     and Security Agreement between DSN Corporation and The CIT
     Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
     Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997.

          10.23.    Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement,
     dated November 21, 1997, between DSN Corporation and The CIT
     Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.19 to the
     ClimaChem Form S-4 Registration Statement, No. 333-44905.

          10.24.    First Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option
     Agreement, dated March 2, 1994, and Second Amendment to
     Stock Option Agreement, dated April 3, 1995, each between
     the Company and Jack E. Golsen, which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
     Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1995.

          10.25.    Baytown Nitric Acid Project and Supply
     Agreement dated June 27, 1997, by and among El Dorado
     Nitrogen Company, El Dorado Chemical Company and Bayer
     Corporation which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-Q for
     the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997.  CERTAIN INFORMATION
     WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF
     COMMISSION ORDER CF #5551, DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 1997,
     GRANTING A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE
     FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
     OF 1934, AS AMENDED.

          10.26.    First Amendment to Baytown Nitric Acid
     Project and Supply Agreement, dated February 1, 1999,
     between El Dorado Nitrogen Company and Bayer Corporation,
     which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended
     December 31, 1998.  CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT
     HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER
     CF #7927, DATED JUNE 9, 1999, GRANTING A REQUEST FOR
     CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
     AND THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.

          10.27.    Service Agreement, dated June 27, 1997,
     between Bayer Corporation and El Dorado Nitrogen Company
     which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit
     10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
     June 30, 1997. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN
     OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER CF #5551, DATED
     SEPTEMBER 25, 1997, GRANTING A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
     TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.

          10.28.    Ground Lease dated June 27, 1997, between
     Bayer Corporation and El Dorado Nitrogen Company which the
     Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.4
     to the Company's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June
     30, 1997.  CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN
     OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER CF #5551,
     DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 1997, GRANTING A REQUEST FOR
     CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
     AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.

          10.29.    Participation Agreement, dated as of June 27,
     1997, among El Dorado Nitrogen Company, Boatmen's Trust
     Company of Texas as Owner Trustee, Security Pacific Leasing
     corporation, as Owner Participant and a Construction Lender,
     Wilmington Trust Company, Bayerische Landesbank, New York
     Branch, as a Construction Lender and the Note Purchaser, and
     Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as
     Construction Loan Agent which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's
     Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997.
     CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS
     IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER CF #5551, DATED
     SEPTEMBER 25, 1997, GRANTING A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
     TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.

          10.30.    Lease Agreement, dated as of June 27, 1997,
     between Boatmen's Trust Company of Texas as Owner Trustee
     and El Dorado Nitrogen Company which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's
     Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997.

          10.31.    Security Agreement and Collateral Assignment
     of Construction Documents, dated as of June 27, 1997, made
     by El Dorado Nitrogen Company which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's
     Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997.

          10.32.    Security Agreement and Collateral Assignment
     of Facility Documents, dated as of June 27, 1997, made by El
     Dorado Nitrogen Company and consented to by Bayer
     Corporation which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 10-Q for
     the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997.

          10.33.    Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement,
     dated March 16, 1998, between The CIT Group/Equipment
     Financing, Inc., and DSN Corporation which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from
     Exhibit 10.54 to the ClimaChem Form S-4 Registration
     Statement, No. 333-44905.

          10.34.    Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated as
     of December 31, 1998, between Mac Venture, Ltd. and Hercules
     Energy Mfg. Corporation, which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.38 to the
     Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

          10.35.    Union Contract, dated August 1, 1998, between
     EDC and the International Association of Machinists and
     Aerospace Workers, which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 10.42 to the Company's Form 10-K for
     the year ended December 31, 1998.

          10.36.    Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated
     April 22, 1998, between the Company and Robert C. Brown,
     M.D.  The Company entered into substantially identical
     agreements with Bernard G. Ille, Jerome D. Shaffer, Raymond
     B. Ackerman, Horace G. Rhodes, Gerald J. Gagner, and Donald
     W. Munson.  The Company will provide copies of these
     agreements to the Commission upon request.

          10.37.    The Company's 1998 Stock Option and Incentive
     Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference
     from Exhibit 10.44 to the Company's Form 10-K for the year
     ended December 31, 1998.

          10.38.    Letter Agreement, dated March 12, 1999,
     between Kestrel Aircraft Company and LSB Industries, Inc.,
     Prime Financial Corporation, Herman Meinders, Carlan K.
     Yates, Larry H. Lemon, Co-Trustee Larry H. Lemon Living
     Trust, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference
     from Exhibit 10.45 to the Company's Form 10-K for the year
     ended December 31, 1998.

          10.39.    LSB Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and
     Incentive Plan which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit "B" to the LSB Proxy Statement, dated
     May 24, 1999, for Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

          10.40 LSB Industries, Inc. Outside Directors Stock
     Option Plan which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit "C" to the LSB Proxy Statement, dated
     May 24, 1999, for Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

          10.41. Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan
     and Security Agreement, dated January 1, 2000, by and
     between Bank of America, N.A. and Climate Master, Inc.,
     International Environmental Corporation, El Dorado Chemical
     Company, and Slurry Explosive Corporation, which the Company
     hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the
     Company's Form 8-K dated December 30, 1999.

          10.42. First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated
     Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 1, 2000, by and
     between Bank of America, N.A. and LSB Industries, Inc.,
     Summit Machine Tool Manufacturing Corp., and Morey Machinery
     Manufacturing Corporation, which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
     Form 8-K dated December 30, 1999.

          10.43 Amendment to Anhydrous Ammonia Sales Agreement,
     dated January 4, 2000, to be effective October 1, 1999,
     between Koch Nitrogen Company and El Dorado Chemical
     Company. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN
     OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A REQUEST BY THE COMPANY FOR
     CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
     COMMISSION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.  THE
     OMITTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
     SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR
     PURPOSES OF SUCH REQUEST.

          10.44 Anhydrous Ammonia Sales Agreement, dated January
     12, 2000, to be effective October 1, 1999, between Koch
     Nitrogen Company and El Dorado Chemical Company. CERTAIN
     INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS
     THE SUBJECT OF A REQUEST BY THE COMPANY FOR CONFIDENTIAL
     TREATMENT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER
     THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.  THE OMITTED INFORMATION HAS
     BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES
     AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF SUCH REQUEST.

          10.45 Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and
     Security Agreement, dated March 1, 2000, by and between Bank
     of America, N.A. and Climate Master, Inc., International
     Environmental Corporation, El Dorado Chemical Company, and
     Slurry Explosive Corporation, which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's
     Form 8-K dated March 1, 2000.

          10.46 Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated
     Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 1, 2000 by and
     between Bank of America, N.A. and LSB Industries Inc.,
     Summit Machine Tool Manufacturing Corp., and Morey Machinery
     Manufacturing Corporation, which the Company hereby
     incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
     Form 8-K dated March 1, 2000.

          10.47 Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated
     Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 31, 2000 by and
     between Bank of America, N.A. and LSB Industries Inc.,
     Summit Machine Tool Manufacturing Corp., and Morey Machinery
     manufacturing Corporation.

          10.48 Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of
     March 6, 2000, between L&S Automotive Products Co. and The
     Zeller Corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by
     reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Form 8K dated
     March 9, 2000.

          10.49 Loan Agreement dated December 23, 1999 between
     ClimateCraft, Inc. and the City of Oklahoma City.

          10.50 Covenant Waiver Letter, dated April 10, 2000 between
     The CIT Group and DSN Corporation.

          99.1 Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2000
     between L&S Automotive Products Co. and Mark Zeller, which
     the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit
     99.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated March 9, 2000.

          21.1. Subsidiaries of the Company.

          23.1. Consent of Independent Auditors.

          27.1. Financial Data Schedule.

          27.2. Restated Financial Data Schedule

          27.3. Restated Financial Data Schedule

     (b)  Reports on Form 8-K.  The Company filed the following
report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 1999.

          (i)   Form 8-K, dated December 30, 1999 (date of event:
December 30, 1999).  The item reported was Item 5, "Other
Events", discussing the payment of interest on the Company's
subsidiary, ClimaChem's $105 million of outstanding 10 3/4%
Senior Notes due 2007 and related failure to meet certain
adjusted tangible net worth and debt ratio requirements under the
Company's revolving credit facility and obtaining a forbearance
agreement with the Company's Lender.

                           SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of  the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended,  the  Company  has
caused  the undersigned, duly-authorized, to sign this report  on
its behalf of this 14 day of April, 2000.

                              LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.


                              By:
                                  /s/ Jack E. Golsen
                                 Jack E. Golsen
                                 Chairman of the Board and
                                 President
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

                              By:
                                  /s/ Tony M. Shelby
                                 Tony M. Shelby
                                 Senior Vice President of Finance
                                 (Principal Financial Officer)

                              By:
                                  /s/ Jim D. Jones
                                 Jim D. Jones
                                 Vice President, Controller and
                                 Treasurer (Principal Accounting
                                 Officer)

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934, as amended, the undersigned have signed this report  on
behalf  of  the  Company,  in the capacities  and  on  the  dates
indicated.

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Jack E. Golsen
                                 Jack E. Golsen, Director

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Tony M. Shelby
                                 Tony M. Shelby, Director

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ David R. Goss
                                 David R. Goss, Director

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Barry H. Golsen
                                 Barry H. Golsen, Director

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Robert C. Brown
                                 Robert C. Brown, Director



Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Bernard G. Ille
                                 Bernard G. Ille, Director

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Jerome D. Shaffer
                                 Jerome D. Shaffer, Director


Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Raymond B. Ackerman
                                 Raymond B. Ackerman, Director

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Horace Rhodes
                                 Horace Rhodes, Director.

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Gerald J. Gagner
                                 Gerald J. Gagner, Director

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Donald W. Munson
                                 Donald W. Munson, Director

Dated:  April 14, 2000          By:
                                  /s/ Charles A. Burtch
                                 Charles A. Burtch, Director